Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18714337›Full record

ArticlePloS one2008

Identification of functional networks of estrogen- and c-Myc-responsive genes and their relationship to response to tamoxifen therapy in breast cancer.

Elizabeth A Musgrove, C Marcelo Sergio, Sherene Loi, Claire K Inman, Luke R Anderson, M Chehani Alles, Mark Pinese, C Elizabeth Caldon, Judith Schütte, Margaret Gardiner-Garden and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. CTLA-4 silencing could promote anti-tumor effects in hepatocellular.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth A MusgroveCancer Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia. e.musgrove@garvan.org.au
C Marcelo Sergio
Sherene Loi
Claire K Inman
Luke R Anderson
M Chehani Alles
Mark Pinese
C Elizabeth Caldon
Judith Schütte
Margaret Gardiner-Garden
Christopher J Ormandy
Grant McArthur
Alison J Butt
Robert L Sutherland
Garvan Institute of Medical Research · AUUNSW Sydney · AUPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUSt Vincent's Clinic · AUSt Vincent's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEstrogen is a pivotal regulator of cell proliferation in the normal breast and breast cancer. Endocrine therapies targeting the estrogen receptor are effective in breast cancer, but their success is limited by intrinsic and acquired resistance. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWith the goal of gaining mechanistic insights into estrogen action and endocrine resistance, we classified estrogen-regulated genes by function, and determined the relationship between functionally-related genesets and the response to tamoxifen in breast cancer patients. Estrogen-responsive genes were identified by transcript profiling of MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Pathway analysis based on functional annotation of these estrogen-regulated genes identified gene signatures with known or predicted roles in cell cycle control, cell growth (i.e. ribosome biogenesis and protein synthesis), cell death/survival signaling and transcriptional regulation. Since inducible expression of c-Myc in antiestrogen-arrested cells can recapitulate many of the effects of estrogen on molecular endpoints related to cell cycle progression, the estrogen-regulated genes that were also targets of c-Myc were identified using cells inducibly expressing c-Myc. Selected genes classified as estrogen and c-Myc targets displayed similar levels of regulation by estrogen and c-Myc and were not estrogen-regulated in the presence of siMyc. Genes regulated by c-Myc accounted for 50% of all acutely estrogen-regulated genes but comprised 85% (110/129 genes) in the cell growth signature. siRNA-mediated inhibition of c-Myc induction impaired estrogen regulation of ribosome biogenesis and protein synthesis, consistent with the prediction that estrogen regulates cell growth principally via c-Myc. The 'cell cycle', 'cell growth' and 'cell death' gene signatures each identified patients with an attenuated response in a cohort of 246 tamoxifen-treated patients. In multivariate analysis the cell death signature was predictive independent of the cell cycle and cell growth signatures. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These functionally-based gene signatures can stratify patients treated with tamoxifen into groups with differing outcome, and potentially identify distinct mechanisms of tamoxifen resistance.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGenes, mycAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsCell CycleCell DeathCell Line, TumorDNA, NeoplasmEstrogensFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycRegression AnalysisTamoxifenTranscription, GeneticAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalDNA, NeoplasmEstrogensProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID18714337
PMCPMC2496892
OpenAlexW2008048656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.