Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18714076›Full record

ReviewMenopause international2008

Prophylactic oophorectomy in premenopausal women and long-term health.

Lynne T Shuster, Bobbie S Gostout, Brandon R Grossardt, Walter A Rocca

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Menopause international, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 235 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Chronic intermittent hypoxia-induced hypertension: the impact of sex hormones.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2024
    Review

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lynne T ShusterDepartment of Internal Medicine, Women's Health Clinic, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. lshuster@mayo.edu
Bobbie S Gostout
Brandon R Grossardt
Walter A Rocca
Department of Medical Sciences · BYMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

ROCHESTER EPIDEMIOLOGY PROJECTR01AR030582 · NIAMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ROCCA, WALTER A · 1986 to 2009
$5.1M
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS OF PARKINSONS DISEASER01NS033978 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC COLL OF MEDICINE, ROCHESTER · PI ROCCA, WALTER A · 1996 to 2005
$4.9M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR030582NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR30582NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS033978NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS33978
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review the data on long-term outcomes in women who underwent prophylactic bilateral oophorectomy, a common surgical procedure that has more than doubled in frequency since the 1960s. STUDY

designLiterature review of the published data on the consequences of prophylactic bilateral oophorectomy. Special emphasis was given to the Mayo Clinic Cohort Study of Oophorectomy and Aging. Main outcome measures Overall mortality, cardiovascular disease, cognitive impairment and dementia, parkinsonism, osteoporosis, psychological wellbeing and sexual function.

resultsThere is a growing body of evidence suggesting that the premature loss of ovarian function caused by bilateral oophorectomy performed before natural menopause is associated with several negative outcomes. In particular, studies have revealed an increased risk of premature death, cardiovascular disease, cognitive impairment or dementia, parkinsonism, osteoporosis and bone fractures, decline in psychological wellbeing and decline in sexual function. The effects involve different organs (e.g. heart, bone, or brain), and different functions within organs (e.g. cognitive, motor, or emotional brain functions). Estrogen treatment may prevent some but not all of these negative outcomes.

conclusionThe potential adverse effects of prophylactic bilateral oophorectomy on heart health, neurological health, bone health and quality of life should be carefully weighed against its potential benefits for cancer risk reduction in women at average risk of ovarian cancer.

Indexed as

Health StatusMenopause, PrematurePremenopauseWomen's HealthCardiovascular DiseasesCausalityCognition DisordersDementiaFemaleHumansNeoplasmsOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalOvariectomyParkinsonian DisordersRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID18714076
PMCPMC2585770
OpenAlexW1970801031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.