Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18713893›Full record

ReviewAnesthesia and analgesia2008

A hypothesis on the origin and evolution of the response to inhaled anesthetics.

James M Sonner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. All Organisms Can Be Anesthetized, but There's No Point?BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Fungi anaesthesia.Scientific reports · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Studies on the mechanism of general anesthesia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  7. Anesthetic pretreatment confers thermotolerance on Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Animal models and conserved processes.Theoretical biology & medical modelling · 2012
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

James M SonnerDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0464, USA. sonnerj@anesthesia.ucsf.edu
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Genes Underlying the Response to Inhaled AnestheticsR01GM069379 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SONNER, JAMES MICHAEL · 2004 to 2008
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM069379
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, I present an evolutionary explanation for why organisms respond to inhaled anesthetics. It is conjectured that organisms today respond to inhaled anesthetics owing to the sensitivity of ion channels to inhaled anesthetics, which in turn has arisen by common descent from ancestral, anesthetic-sensitive ion channels in one-celled organisms (i.e., that the response to anesthetics did not arise as an adaptation of the nervous system, but rather of ion channels that preceded the origin of multicellularity). This sensitivity may have been refined by continuing selection at synapses in multicellular organisms. In particular, it is hypothesized that 1) the beneficial trait that was selected for in one-celled organisms was the coordinated response of ion channels to compounds that were present in the environment, which influenced the conformational equilibrium of ion channels; 2) this coordinated response prevented the deleterious consequences of entry of positive charges into the cell, thereby increasing the fitness of the organism; and 3) these compounds (which may have included organic anions, cations, and zwitterions as well as uncharged compounds) mimicked inhaled anesthetics in that they were interfacially active, and modulated ion channel function by altering bilayer properties coupled to channel function. The proposed hypothesis is consistent with known properties of inhaled anesthetics. In addition, it leads to testable experimental predictions of nonvolatile compounds having anesthetic-like modulatory effects on ion channels and in animals, including endogenous compounds that may modulate ion channel function in health and disease. The latter included metabolites that are increased in some types of end-stage organ failure, and genetic metabolic diseases. Several of these predictions have been tested and proved to be correct.

Indexed as

Ion Channel GatingAnesthesiologyAnesthetics, InhalationAnimalsBiological EvolutionHumansIon ChannelsModels, BiologicalModels, TheoreticalSaccharomyces cerevisiaeAnesthetics, InhalationIon Channels

Identifiers

PMID18713893
PMCPMC2627509
OpenAlexW2041564049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.