Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18713001›Full record

ReviewBiological chemistry2008

Some assembly required: dedicated chaperones in eukaryotic proteasome biogenesis.

Andrew R Kusmierczyk, Mark Hochstrasser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological chemistry, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Regulation of proteasome assembly and activity in health and disease.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Assembly of the 20S proteasome.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2014
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew R KusmierczykDepartment of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8114, USA.
Mark Hochstrasser
Yale University · US

Funding

Function and Assembly of Eukaryotic ProteasomesR01GM083050 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HOCHSTRASSER, MARK W · 2008 to 2019
$3.8M
DEGRADTION OF SHORT-LIVED REGULATORY PROTEINS IN YEASTR01GM046904 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HOCHSTRASSER, MARK W · 1992 to 2020
$3.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM046904NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 26S proteasome is the key eukaryotic protease responsible for the degradation of intracellular proteins. Protein degradation by the 26S proteasome plays important roles in numerous cellular processes, including the cell cycle, differentiation, apoptosis, and the removal of damaged or misfolded proteins. How this 2.5-MDa complex, composed of at least 32 different polypeptides, is assembled in the first place is not well understood. However, it has become evident that this complicated task is facilitated by a framework of protein factors that chaperone the nascent proteasome through its various stages of assembly. We review here the known proteasome-specific assembly factors, most only recently discovered, and describe their potential roles in proteasome assembly, with an emphasis on the many remaining unanswered questions about this intricate process of assisted self-assembly.

Indexed as

AnimalsEukaryotic CellsHumansMolecular ChaperonesProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexMolecular ChaperonesProteasome Endopeptidase Complex

Identifiers

PMID18713001
PMCPMC2650809
OpenAlexW2080378055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.