Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18712402›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2008

[Ankylosing spondylitis in Central and Eastern Europe. Cross-sectional study on treatment modalities, disease activity and quality of life].

W Ebner, T Palotai, C Codreanu, P Géher, A Pahor, K Pavelka, J Smolen, J Szechiński, M Zlnay

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biological therapy in inflammatory rheumatic diseases: issues in Central and Eastern European countries.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2014
    Review
  2. [Spondyloarthritis and quality of life].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

W EbnerMedical Department II, Rheumatology, Hietzing Hospital, Wolkersbergenstr. 1, 1130, Wien, Osterreich. wolfgang.ebner@wienkav.at
T Palotai
C Codreanu
P Géher
A Pahor
K Pavelka
J Smolen
J Szechiński
M Zlnay
Klinik Hietzing · ATCenter for Rheumatology · USInstitute of Rheumatology · CZNational Institute of Rheumatic Diseases · SKNiepubliczna Wyższa Szkoła Medyczna · PLRoyal Irgalmasrendi Hospital · HUSplošna Bolnišnica Celje · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo obtain information on the profile of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), disease activity, previous and current treatments, and the proportion and profile of patients treated with conventional medications but considered eligible for anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy.

methodsParticipants were rheumatologists from seven Central and Eastern European countries who were considered experts in the treatment of AS and were to include 3-5 patients who had never received anti-TNF therapy. Rheumatologists were asked to decide whether they considered their patients candidates for anti-TNF therapy.

resultsA total of 1506 patients were analysed. Overall, 61% of AS patients who had never received anti-TNF therapy until the time of the survey were considered candidates for anti-TNF therapy based on the clinical judgement of their rheumatologists. This proportion ranged from 40% in Slovakia to 84% in Romania. Candidates had higher levels of disease activity and functional impairment, and they were more likely to report a lower quality of life. Only 38% of candidates fulfilled the Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) recommendations with respect to a Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) of at least 4 combined with previous use of at least two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ranging from 18% in Poland to 57% in Hungary.

conclusionMore than half of AS patients currently treated with other medications may be eligible for anti-TNF therapy. Also, rheumatologists regarded disease activity as the determining factor for starting anti-TNF drugs, but their decision did not always fully comply with the ASAS recommendations, confirming the need for continued exchange among the medical community to increase awareness of the ASAS recommendations.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAntirheumatic AgentsAustriaCross-Sectional StudiesDisability EvaluationEurope, EasternHumansQuality of LifeSpondylitis, AnkylosingTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAntirheumatic AgentsTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID18712402
OpenAlexW1812647704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.