Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18712349›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2008

Screening for resistant gram-negative microorganisms to guide empiric therapy of subsequent infection.

Evangelos Papadomichelakis, Flora Kontopidou, Anastasia Antoniadou, Garifalia Poulakou, Evangelos Koratzanis, Petros Kopterides, Irini Mavrou, Apostolos Armaganidis, Helen Giamarellou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Recommendations for antibiotic selection for severe nosocomial infections.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Evangelos Papadomichelakis2nd Critical Care Department, Athens University Medical School, University General Hospital "ATTIKON", Rimini 1, Athens 12462, Greece. edpapado@in.gr
Flora Kontopidou
Anastasia Antoniadou
Garifalia Poulakou
Evangelos Koratzanis
Petros Kopterides
Irini Mavrou
Apostolos Armaganidis
Helen Giamarellou

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo define the potential of resistant gram-negative colonization surveillance to predict etiology of subsequent infection and improve adequacy of empiric antimicrobial treatment.

designRetrospective cohort study.

settingA mixed medical-surgical six-bed intensive care unit (ICU), from November 2003 to December 2006. PATIENTS: All patients having at least one episode of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) or bloodstream infection (BSI) caused by a resistant gram-negative pathogen during the study period.

interventionsColonization surveillance of the respiratory tract and gastrointestinal tract was systematically performed in all ICU patients. Tracheal aspirates were obtained twice weekly and rectal swabs once weekly. Both tracheal and rectal samples were cultured in antibiotic-enriched media (containing ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, imipenem or piperacillin/tazobactam), to focus on resistant gram-negative pathogen isolation. MEASUREMENTS AND

resultsColonization concordance between resistant, gram-negative pathogens of infectious episodes and previous, recent (<or=7 days) colonization of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tract was determined, based on species identity and antimicrobial susceptibility. Concordance was 82% in VAP and 86% in BSI cases and was further confirmed by molecular testing of 15 randomly selected cases by REP-PCR. Previous colonization had high sensitivity and specificity in VAP, but was less specific in BSI cases. Knowledge of previous colonization improved the rate of adequate empiric antimicrobial treatment (91 vs. 40% in VAP and 86 vs. 50% in BSI cases, P < 0.05).

conclusionsColonization surveillance for resistant gram-negative microorganisms is predictive of subsequent infection etiology and can improve empiric antimicrobial treatment adequacy in a critical care setting.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaCarrier StateCohort StudiesCross InfectionGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHumansInfection ControlIntensive Care UnitsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesSentinel SurveillanceAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.