ReviewDer Radiologe2008
[New imaging strategies for monitoring molecular pharmacotherapy of GIST].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prognosis and clinical management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) has changed significantly with the introduction of new molecular-targeted drugs such as imatinib. This development is accompanied by a need to re-evaluate the established imaging criteria used to assess treatment response. The frequently used response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) are mainly based on one-dimensional tumor size and do not take into account functional changes in responding GISTs such as a decrease in CT density or in the number of intratumoral vessels. Positron emission tomography (PET) has been found to be highly sensitive in detecting early response and to have a predictive value in the long term response to imatinib treatment. Monitoring the course of the disease by PET is limited due to scanner availability and economic constraints. Modified CT response criteria using a combination of tumor density and tumor size are especially promising in early response assessment and have a good prognostic value. Further optimization of existing response criteria and evaluation of new candidate markers of treatment response, such as quantitative perfusion will be the key for optimized monitoring of targeted therapies in GIST.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.