Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18710587›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2008

Variation in breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Timothy R Rebbeck, Susan M Domchek

Open access · goldAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Application of NMR metabolomics to search for human disease biomarkers.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2012
    Review
  7. Response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer in BRCA mutation carriers and noncarriers: a single-institution experience.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2011
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy R RebbeckCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. rebbeck@mail.med.upenn.edu
Susan M Domchek
Center for Clinical Research (United States) · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutations can provide important information for women who are concerned about their breast and ovarian cancer risks and need to make relevant prevention and medical management decisions. However, lifetime risks of breast cancer in individual BRCA1/2 mutation carriers have been confusing to apply in clinical decision-making. Published risk estimates vary significantly and are very dependent on the characteristics of the population under study. Recently, Begg and colleagues estimated cancer risks in a population-based study of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Here, we discuss the clinical decision-making implications of this research in the context of risk factors that may influence risk estimates in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Indexed as

DNA Mutational AnalysisGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2Genetic VariationMutationBreast NeoplasmsFamily HealthFemaleGenotypeHeterozygoteHumansOvarian NeoplasmsPhenotypeRiskRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID18710587
PMCPMC2575529
OpenAlexW2046352391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.