ArticleRespiratory research2008
Accuracy of diagnostic registers and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the Devon primary care audit.
Article in Respiratory research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 122 citations in OpenAlex.
- Educational interventions for health professionals managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Antibiotics for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Pulse oximeters to self monitor oxygen saturation levels as part of a personalised asthma action plan for people with asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Interventions to increase referral and uptake to pulmonary rehabilitation in people with COPD: a systematic review.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseasePooled it
- Withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids from patients with COPD with mild or moderate airflow limitation in primary care: a feasibility randomised trial.BMJ open respiratory research · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Antimicrobial stewardship in acute exacerbations of COPD: a qualitative study of hospital pharmacists' perspectives.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- A service evaluation following the implementation of computer guided consultation software to support primary care reviews for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2025Article
- A prospective study on direct out-of-pocket expenses of hospitalized patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a Philippine tertiary care center.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Article
- Reductions in inhaler greenhouse gas emissions by addressing care gaps in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an analysis.BMJ open respiratory research · 2023Article
- Diagnostic differentiation between asthma and COPD in primary care using lung function testing.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Underdiagnosis, false diagnosis and treatment of COPD in a selected population in Northern Greece.The European journal of general practice · 2021Observational
- Colour vision deficiency and sputum colour charts in COPD patients: an exploratory mixed-method study.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2021Article
- Adequacy of Therapy for People with Both COPD and Heart Failure in the UK: Historical Cohort Study.Pragmatic and observational research · 2020Article
- Discontinuation of therapy among COPD patients who experience an improvement in exacerbation status.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019Article
- Article
- Diagnosing COPD in primary care: what has real life practice got to do with guidelines?Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2019Article
- Improvement in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease following a clinical educational program: results from a prospective cohort study in the Sicilian general practice setting.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGuidelines on COPD diagnosis and management encourage primary care physicians to detect the disease at an early stage and to treat patients according to their condition and needs. Problems in guideline implementation include difficulties in diagnosis, using spirometry and the disputed role of reversibility testing. These lead to inaccurate diagnostic registers and inadequacy of administered treatments. This study represents an audit of COPD diagnosis and management in primary care practices in Devon.
methodsSix hundred and thirty two patients on COPD registers in primary care practices were seen by a visiting Respiratory Specialist Nurse. Diagnoses were made according to the NICE guidelines. Reversibility testing was carried out either routinely or based on clinical indication in two sub-samples. Dyspnoea was assessed. Data were entered into a novel IT-based software which computed guideline-based treatment recommendations. Current and recommended treatments were compared.
resultsFive hundred and eighty patients had spirometry. Diagnoses of COPD were confirmed in 422 patients (73%). Thirty nine patients were identified as asthma only, 94 had normal spirometry, 23 were restrictive and 2 had a cardiac disorder. Reversibility testing changed diagnosis of 11% of patients with airflow obstruction, and severity grading in 18%. Three quarters of patients with COPD had been offered practical help with smoking cessation. Short and long-acting anticholinergics and long acting beta-2 agonists had been under-prescribed; in 15-18% of patients they were indicated but not received. Inhaled steroids had been over-prescribed (recommended in 17%; taken by 60%), whereas only 4% of patients with a chronic productive cough were receiving mucolytics. Pulmonary rehabilitation was not available in some areas and was under-used in other areas.
conclusionDiagnostic registers of COPD in primary care contain mistakes leading to inaccurate prevalence estimates and inappropriate treatment decisions. Use of pre-bronchodilator readings for diagnosis overestimates the prevalence and severity in a significant minority, thus post bronchodilator readings should be used. Management of stable COPD does often not correspond to guidelines. The IT system used in this study has the potential to improve diagnosis and management of COPD in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.