Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18709179›Full record

ArticleDrug discovery today. Disease mechanisms2007

Mechanisms of sepsis and insights from clinical trials.

Nitin Seam, Anthony F Suffredini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug discovery today. Disease mechanisms, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Lipidomics in translational research and the clinical significance of lipid-based biomarkers.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2017
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nitin SeamCritical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Anthony F Suffredini

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CL999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple clinical trials of adjunctive therapy for sepsis and septic shock have been conducted to neutralize bacterial components or to modulate host inflammatory responses to infection but with limited success. Many therapies are only beneficial only in patients with a high severity of illness and have minimal or harmful effects in patients that are less severely ill. Improved measures of severity of illness and discovery of biomarkers to help identify these high-risk patients are needed.

Identifiers

PMID18709179
PMCPMC2516940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.