Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18706089›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2008

Identification of a novel CHEK2 variant and assessment of its contribution to the risk of breast cancer in French Canadian women.

David J Novak, Long Qi Chen, Parviz Ghadirian, Nancy Hamel, Phil Zhang, Vanessa Rossiny, Guy Cardinal, André Robidoux, Patricia N Tonin, Francois Rousseau and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. CHEK2 mutation and risk of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Inherited mutations in breast cancer genes--risk and response.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2011
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

David J NovakProgram in Cancer Genetics, Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, H2W 1S6, Canada. david.novak@mail.mcgill.ca
Long Qi Chen
Parviz Ghadirian
Nancy Hamel
Phil Zhang
Vanessa Rossiny
Guy Cardinal
André Robidoux
Patricia N Tonin
Francois Rousseau
Steven A Narod
William D Foulkes
McGill University · CACentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAHôpital Saint-François d'Assise · CAWomen's College Hospital · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CAWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBRCA1 and BRCA2 account for the majority of the known familial breast cancer risk, however, the impact of other cancer susceptibility genes largely remains to be elucidated. Checkpoint Kinase 2 (CHEK2) is an important signal transducer of cellular responses to DNA damage, whose defects have been associated with an increase in breast cancer risk. Previous studies have identified low penetrance CHEK2 alleles such as 1100delC and I157T, as well as variants such as S428F in the Ashkenazi Jewish population and IVS2 + 1G>A in the Polish population. No founder allele has been specifically identified in the French Canadian population.

methodsThe 14 coding exons of CHEK2 were fully sequenced for variant alleles in a panel of 25 affected French Canadian women and 25 healthy controls. Two variants were identified of which one novel variant was further screened for in an additional panel of 667 breast cancer patients and 6548 healthy controls. Additional genotyping was conducted using allele specific PCR and a restriction digest assay. Significance of amino acid substitutions were deduced by employing comparative analysis techniques.

resultsTwo variants were identified: the previously reported silent substitution 252A>G (E84E) and the novel missense variant, 1217G>A (R406H). No significant difference in allele distribution between French Canadian women with breast cancer and healthy controls was observed (3/692, 0.43% vs. 22/6573, 0.33%, respectively, P = 0.73).

conclusionThe novel CHEK2 missense variant identified in this study, R406H, is unlikely to contribute to breast cancer risk in French Canadian women.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenes, BRCA2AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCanadaCheckpoint Kinase 2FemaleFounder EffectGenes, BRCA1Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic VariationHumansMiddle AgedMutation, MissenseProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesCheckpoint Kinase 2CHEK2 protein, humanProtein Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID18706089
PMCPMC2532692
OpenAlexW2136664587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.