Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18705876›Full record

ReviewMolecular plant pathology2008

Bursaphelenchus xylophilus: opportunities in comparative genomics and molecular host-parasite interactions.

John T Jones, Maurice Moens, Manuel Mota, Hongmei Li, Taisei Kikuchi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular plant pathology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 163 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. First finding ofJournal of nematology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. AInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. The Potential ofMicroorganisms · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

John T JonesPPP Programme, SCRI, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK. jjones@scri.ac.uk
Maurice Moens
Manuel Mota
Hongmei Li
Taisei Kikuchi
Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute · JPGhent University · BEInstituut voor Landbouw en Visserijonderzoek · BENanjing Agricultural University · CNUniversity of Évora · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most Bursaphelenchus species are fungal feeding nematodes that colonize dead or dying trees. However, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, the pine wood nematode, is also a pathogen of trees and is the causal agent of pine wilt disease. B. xylophilus is native to North America and here it causes little damage to trees. Where it is introduced to new regions it causes huge damage. The most severely affected areas are found in the Far East but more recently B. xylophilus has been introduced into Portugal and the potential for damage here is also high. As incidence and severity of pine wilt disease are linked to temperature we suggest that climate change is likely to exacerbate the problems caused by B. xylophilus and, in addition, will extend (northwards in Europe) the range in which pine wilt disease can occur. Here we review what is currently known about the interactions of B. xylophilus with its hosts, including recent developments in our understanding of the molecular biology of pathogenicity in the nematode. We also examine the potential developments that could be made by more widespread use of genomics tools to understand interactions between B. xylophilus, bacterial pathogens that have been implicated in disease and host trees.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriaGenomicsHost-Parasite InteractionsPinusPlantsPseudomonasTylenchida

Identifiers

PMID18705876
PMCPMC6640334
OpenAlexW2108489839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.