Trial reportInternational journal of clinical oncology2008
Phase II study of single-agent gemcitabine in heavily pretreated Japanese patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.
Trial report in International journal of clinical oncology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metronomic oral cyclophosphamide (MOC) in the salvage therapy of heavily treated recurrent ovarian cancer patients: a retrospective, multicenter study.BMC cancer · 2014Article
- Trabectedin as single agent in relapsed advanced ovarian cancer: results from a retrospective pooled analysis of three phase II trials.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2013Article
- Analysis of the antitumor activity of gemcitabine and carboplatin against ovarian clear-cell carcinoma using the DNA damage marker γH2AX.OncoTargets and therapy · 2013Article
- Feasibility study of oral cyclophosphamide salvage therapy for the treatment of heavily pretreated patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGemcitabine has been recommended as an active agent for salvage chemotherapy in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer, but no clinical study of this agent has been conducted for Japanese women with ovarian cancer. To evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of gemcitabine for heavily pretreated Japanese patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer, we conducted a single-institute phase II clinical trial.
methodsAll patients had received a minimum of two previous chemotherapy regimens, In this study, gemcitabine was administered at 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle.
resultsA total of 28 patients participated in this study. Although 5 patients (17.9%) needed dose reduction to 800 mg/m(2) because of thrombocytopenia and granulocytopenia, all patients completed an average of 6.7 courses (range, 2-24 courses). The overall response rate, including five partial responses, was 17.9% (95% confidence interval [C I], 6.0-36.9). The median time to progression was 8.8 months and the median survival period was 11.2 months. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicities included leucopenia, 35.7%; granulocytopenia, 39.3%; anemia, 46.4%; and thrombocytopenia, 10.7%. However, no grade 3/4 nonhematological toxicity was observed. The mean delay in treatment was 5.0 +/- 7.7 days (range, 0-15 days) in a total of 562 cycles.
conclusionSingle-agent gemcitabine is an effective salvage chemotherapy regimen in heavily pretreated Japanese patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.