ArticlePlant cell reports2008
Expression analysis of defense-related genes in Zingiber (Zingiberaceae) species with different levels of compatibility to the soft rot pathogen Pythium aphanidermatum.
Article in Plant cell reports, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comprehensive review on genomic resources in medicinally and industrially important major spices for future breeding programs: Status, utility and challenges.Current research in food science · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) cultivars are susceptible to soft rot disease caused by Pythium aphanidermatum. We analyzed changes in transcript levels of 41 genes in the highly susceptible ginger cultivar varada, a less susceptible wild accession (wild ginger), and a Pythium aphanidermatum-resistant relative, Z. zerumbet, following treatment with Pythium aphanidermatum or one of three signaling molecules: salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA), or ethylene (ET). The 41 studied genes were chosen because they are known to be involved in the hypersensitive response (HR), cell signaling, or host defense. Expression of most genes peaked within 24 h of Pythium aphanidermatum infection. Interestingly, the level of induction was typically manyfold higher in Z. zerumbet than in wild ginger. However, several HR genes that were significantly induced in wild ginger were not induced in Z. zerumbet. Most of the genes, including those involved in signaling, did not respond to any of the three signaling molecules in Z. zerumbet while several genes responded to all the three signaling molecules in varada. In wild ginger, a large proportion of the genes responded to ET, but not to SA or JA. These results suggest that different mechanisms govern the three pathosystems. Resistance in Z. zerumbet seems to be independent of HR and the tested signaling molecules, whereas both mechanisms appear to be activated in the tolerance reaction of wild ginger. This work revealed potential defense components of this understudied tropical taxa, and will contribute to the design of strategies for transgenic improvement of ginger.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.