ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2008
Self reported receipt of care consistent with 32 quality indicators: national population survey of adults aged 50 or more in England.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 178 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality indicators for the primary care of osteoarthritis: a systematic review.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2015Pooled it
- Assessing quality of care of elderly patients using the ACOVE quality indicator set: a systematic review.PloS one · 2011Pooled it
- Systematic review: Effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care.BMC health services research · 2010Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- Cost-effectiveness of a model consultation to support self-management in patients with osteoarthritis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2018Trial
- Implementing core NICE guidelines for osteoarthritis in primary care with a model consultation (MOSAICS): a cluster randomised controlled trial.Osteoarthritis and cartilage · 2018Trial
- Effect of a model consultation informed by guidelines on recorded quality of care of osteoarthritis (MOSAICS): a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care.Osteoarthritis and cartilage · 2017Trial
- A nurse-led clinic for patients consulting with osteoarthritis in general practice: development and impact of training in a cluster randomised controlled trial.BMC family practice · 2016Trial
- Implementing the NICE osteoarthritis guidelines: a mixed methods study and cluster randomised trial of a model osteoarthritis consultation in primary care--the Management of OsteoArthritis In Consultations (MOSAICS) study protocol.Implementation science : IS · 2014Trial
- Gatekeepers in primary care - a qualitative study on manual therapists' role in triaging patients with back and neck pain.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Prevalence and severity of frailty amongst middle-aged and older adults conveyed to hospital by ambulance between 2010 and 2017 in Wales.Age and ageing · 2025Article
- Implementation of physical activity interventions for people with inflammatory arthritis: an overview and future recommendations.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2023Review
- Low-value care in musculoskeletal health care: Is there a way forward?Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2022Review
- Quality of knee osteoarthritis care in the Netherlands: a survey on the perspective of people with osteoarthritis.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- The three numbers you need to know about healthcare: the 60-30-10 Challenge.BMC medicine · 2020Article
- Primary care supply and quality of care in England.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2018Article
- Providers and Patients Caught Between Standardization and Individualization: Individualized Standardization as a Solution Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".International journal of health policy and management · 2018Article
- General practitioners' views on managing knee osteoarthritis: a thematic analysis of factors influencing clinical practice guideline implementation in primary care.BMC rheumatology · 2018Article
- Variations in achievement of evidence-based, high-impact quality indicators in general practice: An observational study.PloS one · 2017Observational
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the receipt of effective healthcare interventions in England by adults aged 50 or more with serious health conditions.
designNational structured survey questionnaire with face to face interviews covering medical panel endorsed quality of care indicators for both publicly and privately provided care.
settingPrivate households across England.
participants8688 participants in the English longitudinal study of ageing, of whom 4417 reported diagnoses of one or more of 13 conditions.
main outcome measuresPercentage of indicated interventions received by eligible participants for 32 clinical indicators and seven questions on patient centred care, and aggregate scores.
resultsParticipants were eligible for 19 082 items of indicated care. Receipt of indicated care varied substantially by condition. The percentage of indicated care received by eligible participants was highest for ischaemic heart disease (83%, 95% confidence interval 80% to 86%), followed by hearing problems (79%, 77% to 81%), pain management (78%, 73% to 83%), diabetes (74%, 72% to 76%), smoking cessation (74%, 71% to 76%), hypertension (72%, 69% to 76%), stroke (65%, 54% to 76%), depression (64%, 57% to 70%), patient centred care (58%, 57% to 60%), poor vision (58%, 54% to 63%), osteoporosis (53%, 49% to 57%), urinary incontinence (51%, 47% to 54%), falls management (44%, 37% to 51%), osteoarthritis (29%, 26% to 32%), and overall (62%, 62% to 63%). Substantially more indicated care was received for general medical (74%, 73% to 76%) than for geriatric conditions (57%, 55% to 58%), and for conditions included in the general practice pay for performance contract (75%, 73% to 76%) than excluded from it (58%, 56% to 59%).
conclusionsShortfalls in receipt of basic recommended care by adults aged 50 or more with common health conditions in England were most noticeable in areas associated with disability and frailty, but few areas were exempt. Efforts to improve care have substantial scope to achieve better health outcomes and particularly need to include chronic conditions that affect quality of life of older people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.