Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18702926›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2008

Evaluation and management of urinary retention after a suburethral sling procedure in women.

Lysanne Campeau, Tala Al-Afraa, Jacques Corcos

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lysanne Campeau
Tala Al-Afraa
Jacques Corcos
Jewish General Hospital · CAMcGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suburethral slings have become the most commonly offered surgical procedure for the correction of stress urinary incontinence in women. Overcorrection of urethral angle or exaggerated applied tension may lead to urethral obstruction, causing complete urinary retention or obstructive voiding symptoms. Acute urinary retention usually indicates immediate surgical intervention. Conversely, obstructive voiding symptoms after a sling procedure require a more thorough evaluation to plan the most appropriate therapy. Different operative procedures ranging from urethrolysis to midline sling incision have been described with high success rates and a small risk of recurrent stress urinary incontinence.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansIncidencePrimary PreventionReoperationSuburethral SlingsUrethral ObstructionUrinary CatheterizationUrinary Incontinence, StressUrinary RetentionUrologic Surgical Procedures

Identifiers

PMID18702926
OpenAlexW2017545552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.