ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2008
Distribution of the transposable elements bilbo and gypsy in original and colonizing populations of Drosophila subobscura.
Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Heat Stress on Transposable Element Expression and Derived Small RNAs in Drosophila subobscura.Genome biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Variation in mutation, recombination, and transposition rates inGenome research · 2023Article
- On the Base Composition of Transposable Elements.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Reactivation of transposable elements following hybridization in fission yeast.Genome research · 2022Article
- The Worldwide Invasion of Drosophila suzukii Is Accompanied by a Large Increase of Transposable Element Load and a Small Number of Putatively Adaptive Insertions.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- The Structural, Functional and Evolutionary Impact of Transposable Elements in Eukaryotes.Genes · 2021Review
- Disentangling the determinants of transposable elements dynamics in vertebrate genomes using empirical evidences and simulations.PLoS genetics · 2020Article
- Transposable elements inMobile DNA · 2020Review
- On the Population Dynamics of Junk: A Review on the Population Genomics of Transposable Elements.Genes · 2019Review
- The genomic proliferation of transposable elements in colonizing populations: Schistosoma mansoni in the new world.Genetica · 2015Article
- Lizards and LINEs: selection and demography affect the fate of L1 retrotransposons in the genome of the green anole (Anolis carolinensis).Genome biology and evolution · 2013Article
- Review
- Accumulation and rapid decay of non-LTR retrotransposons in the genome of the three-spine stickleback.Genome biology and evolution · 2012Article
- Osvaldo and Isis retrotransposons as markers of the Drosophila buzzatii colonisation in Australia.BMC evolutionary biology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTransposable elements (TEs) constitute a substantial amount of all eukaryotic genomes. They induce an important proportion of deleterious mutations by insertion into genes or gene regulatory regions. However, their mutational capabilities are not always adverse but can contribute to the genetic diversity and evolution of organisms. Knowledge of their distribution and activity in the genomes of populations under different environmental and demographic regimes, is important to understand their role in species evolution. In this work we study the chromosomal distribution of two TEs, gypsy and bilbo, in original and colonizing populations of Drosophila subobscura to reveal the putative effect of colonization on their insertion profile.
resultsChromosomal frequency distribution of two TEs in one original and three colonizing populations of D. subobscura, is different. Whereas the original population shows a low insertion frequency in most TE sites, colonizing populations have a mixture of high (frequency > or = 10%) and low insertion sites for both TEs. Most highly occupied sites are coincident among colonizing populations and some of them are correlated to chromosomal arrangements. Comparisons of TE copy number between the X chromosome and autosomes show that gypsy occupancy seems to be controlled by negative selection, but bilbo one does not.
conclusionThese results are in accordance that TEs in Drosophila subobscura colonizing populations are submitted to a founder effect followed by genetic drift as a consequence of colonization. This would explain the high insertion frequencies of bilbo and gypsy in coincident sites of colonizing populations. High occupancy sites would represent insertion events prior to colonization. Sites of low frequency would be insertions that occurred after colonization and/or copies from the original population whose frequency is decreasing in colonizing populations. This work is a pioneer attempt to explain the chromosomal distribution of TEs in a colonizing species with high inversion polymorphism to reveal the putative effect of arrangements in TE insertion profiles. In general no associations between arrangements and TE have been found, except in a few cases where the association is very strong. Alternatively, founder drift effects, seem to play a leading role in TE genome distribution in colonizing populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.