Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18702637›Full record

ArticleAnnals of human genetics2008

Efficient association study design via power-optimized tag SNP selection.

B Han, H M Kang, M S Seo, N Zaitlen, E Eskin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of human genetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Collective Ranking Method for Genome-wide Association Studies.ACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine · 2012
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

B HanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
H M Kang
M S Seo
N Zaitlen
E Eskin

Funding

VISUALIZATION TOOLS FOR AUTOMATED MOLECULAR MICROSCOPYP41RR008605 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PAPADOPOULOS, PHILIP · 1994 to 2011
$28.1M
INFRASTRUCTURE OF BIOENGINEERING DEVELOPMENTC06RR017588 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO · PI GOUGH, DAVID A · 2002 to 2002
$696k
Discovering the Genetic Basis of HypertensionK25HL080079 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ESKIN, ELEAZAR · 2006 to 2010
$685k
NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR017588NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR008605NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR08605NHLBI NIH HHS 1K25HL080079NHLBI NIH HHS K25 HL080079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discovering statistical correlation between causal genetic variation and clinical traits through association studies is an important method for identifying the genetic basis of human diseases. Since fully resequencing a cohort is prohibitively costly, genetic association studies take advantage of local correlation structure (or linkage disequilibrium) between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) by selecting a subset of SNPs to be genotyped (tag SNPs). While many current association studies are performed using commercially available high-throughput genotyping products that define a set of tag SNPs, choosing tag SNPs remains an important problem for both custom follow-up studies as well as designing the high-throughput genotyping products themselves. The most widely used tag SNP selection method optimizes the correlation between SNPs (r(2)). However, tag SNPs chosen based on an r(2) criterion do not necessarily maximize the statistical power of an association study. We propose a study design framework that chooses SNPs to maximize power and efficiently measures the power through empirical simulation. Empirical results based on the HapMap data show that our method gains considerable power over a widely used r(2)-based method, or equivalently reduces the number of tag SNPs required to attain the desired power of a study. Our power-optimized 100k whole genome tag set provides equivalent power to the Affymetrix 500k chip for the CEU population. For the design of custom follow-up studies, our method provides up to twice the power increase using the same number of tag SNPs as r(2)-based methods. Our method is publicly available via web server at http://design.cs.ucla.edu.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TechniquesGenome, HumanPolymorphism, Single NucleotideGene FrequencyHumansLinkage DisequilibriumModels, Statistical

Identifiers

PMID18702637
PMCPMC2574965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.