Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18702055›Full record

ReviewElectrophoresis2008

Multiplexed detection and applications for separations on parallel microchips.

John F Dishinger, Robert T Kennedy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Electrophoresis, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John F DishingerDepartment of Chemistry, University of Michigan, 930 N. University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Robert T Kennedy

Funding

Design and Use of Methods for Peptide Secretion Studies - Diversity SupplementR37DK046960 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KENNEDY, ROBERT T · 2006 to 2015
$3.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS R37 DK046960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much work has been performed since the development of the lab-on-a-chip concept that has brought microfabricated systems to the forefront of bioanalytical research. The success of using these microchips for performing complicated biological assays faster and cheaper than conventional methods has facilitated their emerging popularity among researchers. A recently exploited advantage of microfabricated technology has led to the creation of single wafers with multiple channel manifolds for high-throughput experiments. Efforts toward parallel microchip development have yielded fascinating new devices for chemical separations showing the potential for replacing conventional multiplexing techniques. This review will focus on recent work toward multiplexed separations on microdevices and complementary detection instrumentation.

Indexed as

DNAElectrophoresis, MicrochipImmunoassayMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesDNA

Identifiers

PMID18702055
PMCPMC2597776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.