ArticleReviews in obstetrics & gynecology2008
Sterilization in the United States.
Article in Reviews in obstetrics & gynecology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of modified one-layer and formal two-layer microsurgical vasovasostomy for vasectomy reversal.Basic and clinical andrology · 2026Article
- Exploring Undergraduates' Attitudes Toward Sterilization as Contraception in the Northeastern United States: A Brief Report.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2025Article
- Vasectomy incidence in the military health system after the reversal of Roe v. Wade.International journal of impotence research · 2024Article
- Prevalence and factors associated with female sterilization in Rwanda: evidence from the demographic and health survey data (2019-2020).BMC public health · 2023Article
- Legal medicine aspects of female sterilization: our experience.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Vasectomy reversal outcomes in men after testosterone therapy.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Applicability, Safety, and Efficiency of Salpingectomy versus Electrocoagulation and Laparoscopic Tubal Section in Ambulatory.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022Observational
- Drug Eluting Embolization Particles for Permanent Contraception.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2022Article
- Ethics of a Mandatory Waiting Period for Female Sterilization.The Hastings Center report · 2022Review
- What constitutes a good healthcare experience for unintended pregnancy? A qualitative study among young people in California.Culture, health & sexuality · 2022Article
- Discriminatory regulations on postpartum sterilization for Medicaid recipients propagate health inequities.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2022Article
- Survey: acceptability of opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy in Flanders.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2021Article
- Ecology of the Anthropocene signals hope for consciously managing the planetary ecosystem.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Patients' perceptions toward and the driving factors of decision-making for opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy at the time of cesarean section.Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2020Article
- Tubal Ligation and Age at Natural Menopause.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2019Article
- Design, Manufacture, andMRS advances · 2018Article
- Barriers to Offering Vasectomy at Publicly Funded Family Planning Organizations in Texas.American journal of men's health · 2017Article
- Factors Related to Intention to Undergo Female Sterilization Among Married Women in Rural Kathmandu, Nepal.Nepal journal of epidemiology · 2016Article
- Incidence, diagnosis and management of tubal and nontubal ectopic pregnancies: a review.Fertility research and practice · 2015Review
- Molar pregnancy after tubal ligation in a patient with neuroendocrine tumour: when a rare condition coincides with an unexpected diagnosis.BMJ case reports · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unintended pregnancies are expensive for patients and for society in terms of medical costs, the cost of caring for more children, and the cost to personal and professional goals. Sterilization is the most common contraceptive method utilized by couples in the United States. Given technological advances over the past few decades, male and female surgical sterilization has become a safe, convenient, easy, and highly effective birth control method for the long term. This article reviews current male and female sterilization options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18701927PMC2492586What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.