ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2008
Prospective evaluation of a novel one-stop testicular clinic.
Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- General practitioner referrals to one-stop clinics for symptoms that could be indicative of cancer: a systematic review of use and clinical outcomes.Family practice · 2019Pooled it
- Interventions to reduce waiting times for elective procedures.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Impact of nurse-surgeons on patient-centred outcomes: A systematic review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2022Review
- Does clinical validation and the implementation of new models of outpatient service delivery have the potential to reduce waiting lists? A pilot study in Letterkenny University Hospital.Irish journal of medical science · 2020Article
- A novel rapid access testicular cancer clinic: prospective evaluation after one year.Irish journal of medical science · 2016Article
- Scrotal signs and symptoms in the general population, the value of testis self-examination and the pitfalls of a scrotal screening programme: is the two-week rule relevant?World journal of urology · 2011Article
- Clinical stage I seminoma: the case for surveillance.World journal of urology · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn 2003, the waiting time for routine scrotal assessment approached 6 months in our hospital. The patients' diagnostic pathway was not uniform and involved several delays between general practitioner, radiologist and urologist. If malignancy was suspected, patients were seen and assessed within 2 weeks. However, it was possible for patients with unsuspected malignancy to have their diagnosis delayed. PATIENTS AND
methodsFunding was provided by the NHS Modernisation Agency's Action On Urology project. Men who were referred by their general practitioner (GP) with a testicular or scrotal condition would be reviewed in a one-stop joint sonographer and urology nurse specialist clinic provided entirely within the urology department with rapid open access. Data were prospectively collected for 2 years. Source of referral, suspected diagnosis, findings and outcome were recorded.
resultsA total of 1017 patients attended the clinic over this period; of these, 203 (4%) were referred under the '2-week wait' criteria. Of patients attending the clinic, 79% were discharged to GP care, 8% were added to the waiting list for a surgical procedure and 20% were referred with 'testicular lump'. Eleven patients were suspected to have testicular tumour on ultrasound and proceeded to orchidectomy in this period. One patient (0.1%) was found to have an unsuspected seminoma. The waiting time for all scrotal ultrasound examinations has fallen from 22 to 2 weeks. The waiting times for intravenous urography and general ultrasound were also significantly reduced following the introduction of this service (P = 0.005).
conclusionsThe majority of patients passing through this clinic are the 'worried-well' with benign scrotal pathology. They can now be seen within 2 weeks regardless of whether their GP suspects testicular tumour. This reduces anxiety in this large group of patients freeing capacity elsewhere in the diagnostic imaging department.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.