Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18698032›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2008

The combination of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors with gemcitabine and radiation in pancreatic cancer.

Meredith A Morgan, Leslie A Parsels, Laura E Kollar, Daniel P Normolle, Jonathan Maybaum, Theodore S Lawrence

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Brachytherapy via a depot of biopolymer-boundNature biomedical engineering · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Calcium channel blockers potentiate gemcitabine chemotherapy  in pancreatic cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meredith A MorganDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-5637, USA. mmccrack@med.umich.edu
Leslie A Parsels
Laura E Kollar
Daniel P Normolle
Jonathan Maybaum
Theodore S Lawrence
Molecular Oncology (United States) · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI THEODORE S LAWRENCE · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
RADIOSENSITIZATION BY GEMCITABINER01CA078554 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LAWRENCE, THEODORE S · 1999 to 2010
$3.9M
NCI NIH HHS 2R0-1 CA078554NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NCI NIH HHS P30 CA46592NCI NIH HHS R01 CA078554
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGemcitabine-radiotherapy is a standard treatment for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Clinical data have shown that gemcitabine plus erlotinib is superior to gemcitabine alone for advanced pancreatic cancer. Therefore, we investigated the effects of the combination of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors with gemcitabine and radiation on a pancreatic cancer model. EXPERIMENTAL

designEGFR signaling was analyzed by measuring phosphorylated EGFR (pEGFR(Y845, (Y1173)) and AKT (pAKT(S473)) protein levels in pancreatic cancer cell lines and tumors. The effects of scheduling on gemcitabine-mediated cytotoxicity and radiosensitization combined with erlotinib were determined by clonogenic survival. In vivo, the effects of cetuximab or erlotinib in combination with gemcitabine-radiation on the growth of BxPC-3 tumor xenografts were measured.

resultsWe found in vitro that gemcitabine induced phosphorylation of EGFR at Y845 and Y1173 that was blocked by erlotinib. Treatment of BxPC-3 cells with gemcitabine before erlotinib enhanced gemcitabine-mediated cytotoxicity without abrogating radiosensitization. In vivo, cetuximab or erlotinib in combination with gemcitabine-radiation inhibited growth compared with gemcitabine-radiation (time to tumor doubling: gemcitabine + radiation, 19 +/- 3 days; cetuximab + gemcitabine + radiation, 30 +/- 3 days; P < 0.05, erlotinib + gemcitabine + radiation 28 +/- 3 days; P < 0.1). Cetuximab or erlotinib in combination with gemcitabine-radiation resulted in significant inhibition of pEGFR(Y1173) and pAKT(S473) early in treatment, and pEGFR(Y845), pEGFR(Y1173), and pAKT(S473) by the end of treatment. This study shows a novel difference pEGFR(Y845) and pEGFR(Y1173) in response to EGFR inhibition.

conclusionsThese results show that the EGFR inhibitors cetuximab and erlotinib increase the efficacy of gemcitabine-radiation. This work supports the integration of EGFR inhibitors with gemcitabine-radiation in clinical trials for pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

RadiotherapyAdenocarcinomaAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCell Line, TumorCetuximabCombined Modality TherapyDeoxycytidineErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideGemcitabineHumansImmunoblottingMiceAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCetuximabDeoxycytidineErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideGemcitabineQuinazolinesRadiation-Sensitizing Agents

Identifiers

PMID18698032
PMCPMC2699587
OpenAlexW2132945301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.