Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18697905›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2008

Dlx genes pattern mammalian jaw primordium by regulating both lower jaw-specific and upper jaw-specific genetic programs.

Juhee Jeong, Xue Li, Robert J McEvilly, Michael G Rosenfeld, Thomas Lufkin, John L R Rubenstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Assessing candidate DLX-regulated genes in the first pharyngeal arch of chick embryos.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. DLX genes and proteins in mammalian forebrain development.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Craniofacial developmental biology in the single-cell era.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. A switch in jaw form-function coupling during the evolution of mammals.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Orofacial Cleft and Mandibular Prognathism-Human Genetics and Animal Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  18. Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Juhee JeongDepartment of Psychiatry, Nina Ireland Laboratory of Developmental Neurobiology, University of California San Francisco, 1550 4th street, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA. juhee.jeong@ucsf.edu
Xue Li
Robert J McEvilly
Michael G Rosenfeld
Thomas Lufkin
John L R Rubenstein
University of California, San Francisco · USGenome Institute of Singapore · SGHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Regulation of craniofacial development by the Dlx genes.R01DC005667 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI RUBENSTEIN, JOHN L. R. · 2003 to 2007
$1.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005667
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dlx transcription factors are implicated in patterning the mammalian jaw, based on their nested expression patterns in the first branchial arch (primordium for jaw) and mutant phenotypes; inactivation of Dlx1 and Dlx2 (Dlx1/2-/-) causes defects in the upper jaw, whereas Dlx5/6(-/-) results in homeotic transformation of the lower jaw into upper jaw. Therefore, the 'Dlx codes' appear to regionalize the jaw primordium such that Dlx1/2 regulate upper jaw development, while Dlx5/6 confer the lower jaw fate. Towards identifying the genetic pathways downstream of Dlx5/6, we compared the gene expression profiles of the wild-type and Dlx5/6(-/-) mouse mandibular arch (prospective lower jaw). We identified 20 previously unrecognized Dlx5/6-downstream genes, of which 12 were downregulated and 8 upregulated in the mutant. We found a Dlx-regulated transcriptional enhancer in close proximity to Gbx2, one of the Dlx5/6-downstream genes, strongly suggesting that Gbx2 is a direct target of Dlx5/6. We also showed that Pou3f3 is normally expressed in the maxillary (prospective upper jaw) but not mandibular arch, is upregulated in the mandibular arch of Dlx5/6(-/-), and is essential for formation of some of the maxillary arch-derived skeleton. A comparative analysis of the morphological and molecular phenotypes of various Dlx single and double mutants revealed that Dlx1, 2, 5 and 6 act both partially redundantly and antagonistically to direct differential expression of downstream genes in each domain of the first branchial arch. We propose a new model for Dlx-mediated mammalian jaw patterning.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceBody PatterningBranchial RegionEnhancer Elements, GeneticForkhead Box Protein L2Forkhead Transcription FactorsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenomeHomeodomain ProteinsJawMiceMolecular Sequence DataMutationNerve Tissue ProteinsDistal-less homeobox proteinsForkhead Box Protein L2Forkhead Transcription FactorsFoxl2 protein, mouseGbx2 protein, mouseHomeodomain ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsPou3f3 protein, mousePOU Domain FactorsRepressor ProteinsRNA, MessengerRNA, UntranslatedTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID18697905
PMCPMC4913551
OpenAlexW2095313195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.