Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18696037›Full record

ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2008

[Bioartificial urothelium generated from bladder washings. A future therapeutic option for reconstructive surgery].

G Feil, S Maurer, U Nagele, K-D Sievert, A Stenzl

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G FeilKlinik für Urologie, Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen, Deutschland. gerhard.feil@med.uni-tuebingen.de
S Maurer
U Nagele
K-D Sievert
A Stenzl
University of Tübingen · DEBG Klinik Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reconstructive surgery of lower urinary tract disorders can be limited by a shortage of adequate autologous tissue. Tissue engineering is an option for surgical reconstruction with evolved biological substitutes. Urethral repair with bioartificial urothelial implants can be an innovative method for sustained urothelial regeneration in situ. The needed urothelial cells are commonly isolated from native urothelium requiring surgery.The aim of this study was to establish primary human urothelial cell cultures from bladder washings in serum-free media and to generate urothelial tissue without seeding of matrices in a feeder cell-free system. It could be demonstrated that under these conditions bioartificial urothelium can be developed successfully from bladder washings. Its multilayered cellular structure and the initial differentiation in vitro, similar to native-grown urothelial tissue, are promising with regard to intended clinical application. Current work focuses on establishing cell culture techniques according to legal regulations, terminal differentiation of the urothelial constructs in vitro, and techniques to surgically implant lab-grown bioartificial urothelium.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCell DifferentiationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTherapeutic IrrigationTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsUrethraUrinary BladderUrothelium

Identifiers

PMID18696037
OpenAlexW1536219359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.