ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2008
Oscheius tipulae as an example of eEF1A gene diversity in nematodes.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We characterized four eEF1A genes in the alternative rhabditid nematode model organism Oscheius tipulae. This is twice the copy number of eEF1A genes in C. elegans, C. briggsae, and, probably, many other free-living and parasitic nematodes. The introns show features remarkably different from those of other metazoan eEF1A genes. Most of the introns in the eEF1A genes are specific to O. tipulae and are not shared with any of the other genes described in metazoans. Most of the introns are phase 0 (inserted between two codons), and few are inserted in protosplice sites (introns inserted between the nucleotide sequence A/CAG and G/A). Two of these phase 0 introns are conserved in sequence in two or more of the four eEF1A gene copies, and are inserted in the same position in the genes. Neither of these characteristics has been detected in any of the nematode eEF1A genes characterized to date. The coding sequences were also compared with other eEF1A cDNAs from 11 different nematodes to determine the variability of these genes within the phylum Nematoda. Parsimony and distance trees yielded similar topologies, which were similar to those created using other molecular markers. The presence of more than one copy of the eEF1A gene with nearly identical coding regions makes it difficult to define the orthologous cDNAs. As shown by our data on O. tipulae, careful and extensive examination of intron positions in the eEF1A gene across the phylum is necessary to define their potential for use as valid phylogenetic markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.