Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18694949›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2008

Activities of antifungal agents against yeasts and filamentous fungi: assessment according to the methodology of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing.

Cornelia Lass-Flörl, Astrid Mayr, Susanne Perkhofer, Guido Hinterberger, Johann Hausdorfer, Cornelia Speth, Manfred Fille

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pharmacokinetics of posaconazole prophylaxis of patients with acute myeloid leukemia.Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy · 2015
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Rare Yeasts in Latin America: Uncommon Yet Meaningful.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Liposomal amphotericin B-the past.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evaluation of molecular identification ofSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Cutaneous geotrichosis due toAccess microbiology · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Potent and Synergistic Extract Combinations fromMedicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015
    Article
  20. Unpredictable susceptibility of emerging clinical moulds to tri-azoles: review of the literature and upcoming challenges for mould identification.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cornelia Lass-FlörlDepartment of Hygiene, Microbiology and Social Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Fritz Pregl Str. 3, Innsbruck 6020, Austria. Cornelia.lass-floerl@i-med.ac.at
Astrid Mayr
Susanne Perkhofer
Guido Hinterberger
Johann Hausdorfer
Cornelia Speth
Manfred Fille
Innsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared the activities of antifungal agents against a wide range of yeasts and filamentous fungi. The methodology of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) for yeasts and spore-forming molds was applied; and a total of 349 clinical isolates of Candida spp., other yeast species, Aspergillus spp., and nondermatophyte non-Aspergillus spp. were investigated. The average geometric mean (GM) of the MICs of the various drugs for Candida spp. were as follows: amphotericin B (AMB), 0.55 microg/ml; liposomal amphotericin B (l-AMB); 0.35 microg/ml; itraconazole (ITC), 0.56 microg/ml; voriconazole (VRC), 0.45 microg/ml; posaconazole (POS), 0.44 microg/ml; and caspofungin (CPF), 0.45 microg/ml. The data indicated that the majority of Candida spp. were susceptible to the traditional and new antifungal drugs. For Aspergillus spp., the average GM MICs of AMB, l-AMB, ITC, VRC, POS, and CPF were 1.49 microg/ml, 1.44 microg/ml, 0.65 microg/ml, 0.34 microg/ml, 0.25 microg/ml, and 0.32 microg/ml, respectively. For the various zygomycetes, the average GM MICs of AMB, l-AMB, ITC, and POS were 1.36 microg/ml, 1.42 microg/ml, 4.37 microg/ml, and 1.65 microg/ml, respectively. Other yeastlike fungi and molds displayed various patterns of susceptibility. In general, the minimal fungicidal concentrations were 1 to 3 dilutions higher than the corresponding MICs. POS, AMB, and l-AMB showed activities against a broader range of fungi than ITC, VRC, and CPF did. Emerging pathogens such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Fusarium solani were not killed by any drug. In summary, the EUCAST data showed that the in vitro susceptibilities of yeasts and filamentous fungi are variable, that susceptibility occurs among and within various genera and species, and that susceptibility depends on the antifungal drug tested. AMB, l-AMB, and POS were active against the majority of pathogens, including species that cause rare and difficult-to-treat infections.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAntifungal AgentsAspergillusCandidaDrug Resistance, FungalEuropeFungiGuidelines as TopicHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMycosesOpportunistic InfectionsTriazolesYeastsAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsposaconazoleTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID18694949
PMCPMC2565893
OpenAlexW2149313557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.