Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18694525›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2008

Species distribution and in vitro antifungal susceptibility of oral yeast isolates from Tanzanian HIV-infected patients with primary and recurrent oropharyngeal candidiasis.

Omar J M Hamza, Mecky I N Matee, Mainen J Moshi, Elison N M Simon, Ferdinand Mugusi, Frans H M Mikx, Wim H van Palenstein Helderman, Antonius J M M Rijs, André J A M van der Ven, Paul E Verweij

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Non-Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Does the use of topical azoles have an impact on antifungal resistance?The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Prevalence and drug susceptibility of clinicalOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Research square · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Infection and drug resistance · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Antifungal Drug Susceptibility ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  20. Phytochemical Characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Omar J M HamzaDepartment of Oral Surgery and Oral Pathology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. dromar20@yahoo.com
Mecky I N Matee
Mainen J Moshi
Elison N M Simon
Ferdinand Mugusi
Frans H M Mikx
Wim H van Palenstein Helderman
Antonius J M M Rijs
André J A M van der Ven
Paul E Verweij

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Tanzania, little is known on the species distribution and antifungal susceptibility profiles of yeast isolates from HIV-infected patients with primary and recurrent oropharyngeal candidiasis.

methodsA total of 296 clinical oral yeasts were isolated from 292 HIV-infected patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis at the Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Identification of the yeasts was performed using standard phenotypic methods. Antifungal susceptibility to fluconazole, itraconazole, miconazole, clotrimazole, amphotericin B and nystatin was assessed using a broth microdilution format according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI; M27-A2).

resultsCandida albicans was the most frequently isolated species from 250 (84.5%) patients followed by C. glabrata from 20 (6.8%) patients, and C. krusei from 10 (3.4%) patients. There was no observed significant difference in species distribution between patients with primary and recurrent oropharyngeal candidiasis, but isolates cultured from patients previously treated were significantly less susceptible to the azole compounds compared to those cultured from antifungal naïve patients.

conclusionC. albicans was the most frequently isolated species from patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis. Oral yeast isolates from Tanzania had high level susceptibility to the antifungal agents tested. Recurrent oropharyngeal candidiasis and previous antifungal therapy significantly correlated with reduced susceptibility to azoles antifungal agents.

Indexed as

AdultAIDS-Related Opportunistic InfectionsAntifungal AgentsCandida albicansCandidiasis, OralFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsOropharynxRecurrenceTanzaniaYeastsAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID18694525
PMCPMC2518160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.