Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18694354›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on biological therapy2008

Replicating adenovirus vector prime/protein boost strategies for HIV vaccine development.

L Jean Patterson, Marjorie Robert-Guroff

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on biological therapy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. DNA vaccines for targeting bacterial infections.Expert review of vaccines · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

L Jean PattersonNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Vaccine Branch, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-5065, USA.
Marjorie Robert-Guroff

Funding

Development of a Vaccine for HIVAIDS: Translation to the ClinicZIABC011063 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI ROBERT-GUROFF, MARJORIE · 2009 to 2020
$6.8M
HUMORAL AND CELLULAR IMMUNE RESPONSES TO HUMAN AND NONHUMAN PRIMATE RETROVIRUSESZ01BC005536 · NCI · BASIC SCIENCES · PI ROBERT-GUROFF, MARJORIE · 1996 to 2007
$4.1M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC005536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years the HIV vaccine field introduced a number of promising vaccine candidates into human clinical trials.

objectiveTo briefly discuss the advances made in vaccine development and HIV pathogenesis and give an overview of the body of work our lab has generated in multiple animal models on replication-competent Adenovirus recombinant vaccines.

methodsEmphasis is placed on comparative examination of vaccine components, routes of immunization and challenge models using replicating Adenovirus vectors. RESULTS/

conclusionThe findings make the case that replicating Adenovirus vectors are superior in priming multiple arms of the immune system, and in conjunction with protein boosting, have resulted in dramatic protective efficacy leading to their advancement to Phase I trials. Implications of the recent halting of the Merck Ad5-HIV Phase IIb clinical trial of our vaccine approach and other vectored vaccines are discussed.

Indexed as

Genetic VectorsVirus ReplicationAdenoviridaeAIDS VaccinesAnimalsAIDS Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID18694354
PMCPMC2538611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.