Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18693941›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2007

A rationale for parsimonious laboratory term mapping by frequency.

Daniel J Vreeman, John T Finnell, J Marc Overhage

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Learning from the crowd while mapping to LOINC.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Enabling international adoption of LOINC through translation.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2012
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Representing Patient Assessments in LOINC®.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2010
    Article
  15. LOINC® - A Universal Catalog of Individual Clinical Observations and Uniform Representation of Enumerated Collections.International journal of functional informatics and personalised medicine · 2010
    Article
  16. Embracing change in a health information exchange.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2008
    Article
  17. Enhancing laboratory report contents to improve outpatient management of test results.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel J VreemanRegenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA.
John T Finnell
J Marc Overhage

Funding

REGIONAL MEDICAL LIBRARY SERVICESN01LM033501 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SW MED CTR/DALLAS · PI MILLER, JEAN · 1985 to 1986
–
NLM NIH HHS N01-LM-3-3501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mapping local observation codes to a standard vocabulary provides a bridge across the many islands of data that reside in isolated systems, but mapping is resource intensive. To help prioritize the mapping effort, we analyzed laboratory results reported over a thirteen month period from five institutions in the Indiana Network for Patient Care. Overall, more than 4,000 laboratory observation codes accounted for almost 49 million results. Of the observations reported in the thirteen months, 80 codes (2%) accounted for 80% of the total volume from all institutions and 784 codes (19%) accounted for 99% of the volume from all institutions. The 244 to 517 observation codes that represented 99% of the volume at each institution also captured all results for more than 99% of the patients at that institution. Our findings suggest that focusing the mapping effort on this modest set of high-yield codes can reduce the barriers to interoperability.

Indexed as

Clinical Laboratory Information SystemsForms and Records ControlLogical Observation Identifiers Names and CodesMedical Record LinkageIndianaInformation ServicesLaboratories, HospitalMedical Records Systems, Computerized

Identifiers

PMID18693941
PMCPMC2655785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.