Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18693240›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2008

Dominant alleles identify SET domain residues required for histone methyltransferase of Polycomb repressive complex 2.

Preeti Joshi, Elizabeth A Carrington, Liangjun Wang, Carrie S Ketel, Ellen L Miller, Richard S Jones, Jeffrey A Simon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Selective inhibitors of protein methyltransferases.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Preeti JoshiDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minneapolis 55455.
Elizabeth A CarringtonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas 75275.
Liangjun WangDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minneapolis 55455.
Carrie S KetelDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minneapolis 55455.
Ellen L MillerDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minneapolis 55455.
Richard S JonesDepartment of Biological Sciences, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas 75275. Electronic address: rjones@mail.smu.edu.
Jeffrey A SimonDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minneapolis 55455. Electronic address: simon004@umn.edu.
University of Minnesota · USSouthern Methodist University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polycomb gene silencing requires histone methyltransferase activity of Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), which methylates lysine 27 of histone H3. Information on how PRC2 works is limited by lack of structural data on the catalytic subunit, Enhancer of zeste (E(Z)), and the paucity of E(z) mutant alleles that alter its SET domain. Here we analyze missense alleles of Drosophila E(z), selected for molecular study because of their dominant genetic effects. Four missense alleles identify key E(Z) SET domain residues, and a fifth is located in the adjacent CXC domain. Analysis of mutant PRC2 complexes in vitro, and H3-K27 methylation in vivo, shows that each SET domain mutation disrupts PRC2 histone methyltransferase. Based on known SET domain structures, the mutations likely affect either the lysine-substrate binding pocket, the binding site for the adenosylmethionine methyl donor, or a critical tyrosine predicted to interact with the substrate lysine epsilon-amino group. In contrast, the CXC mutant retains catalytic activity, Lys-27 specificity, and trimethylation capacity. Deletion analysis also reveals a functional requirement for a conserved E(Z) domain N-terminal to CXC and SET. These results identify critical SET domain residues needed for PRC2 enzyme function, and they also emphasize functional inputs from outside the SET domain.

Indexed as

AllelesAnimalsCatalytic DomainDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGenes, DominantGene SilencingHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHistonesMethylationMutation, MissensePolycomb Repressive Complex 1Protein Structure, TertiaryDrosophila ProteinsHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHistonesPc protein, DrosophilaPolycomb Repressive Complex 1PRC2 protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID18693240
PMCPMC2562053
OpenAlexW1969578494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.