ReviewSeminars in oncology2008
Cytogenetic, molecular genetic, and clinical characteristics of acute myeloid leukemia with a complex karyotype.
Review in Seminars in oncology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
91 citing papers in PubMed, 184 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bone marrow necrosis in acute leukemia: Clinical characteristic and outcome.American journal of hematology · 2015Trial
- Early allo-SCT for AML with a complex aberrant karyotype--results from a prospective pilot study.Bone marrow transplantation · 2012Trial
- Comparative effectiveness of HMA with venetoclax vs intensive chemotherapy in AML with very high-risk cytogenetics.Blood neoplasia · 2026Article
- Chromosome Karyotyping in Hematological Malignancies: Current Status and Future Directions.Current medical science · 2026Review
- Characterization of neocentromeric marker chromosome derived from chromosome 11: a rare entity in four patients with acute leukemia.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Enhancer Hijacking Discovery in Acute Myeloid Leukemia by Pyjacker Identifies MNX1 Activation via Deletion 7q.Blood cancer discovery · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Genetic Profiling of Acute and Chronic Leukemia via Next-Generation Sequencing: Current Insights and Future Perspectives.Hematology reports · 2025Review
- Abnormalities in Chromosomes 5 and 7 in Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Newer combination treatments for breast cancer coexisting with acute myeloid leukemia in the novel regimens era: A case report and literature review.Oncology letters · 2024Article
- Chromothripsis in myeloid malignancies.Annals of hematology · 2024Review
- Genomic characterization of AML with aberrations of chromosome 7: a multinational cohort of 519 patients.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2024Article
- Refinement of Risk-Stratification of Cytogenetically Normal Acute Myeloid Leukemia Adult Patients by MN1 Expression.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Article
- High hyperdiploid karyotype with ≥ 49 chromosomes represents a heterogeneous subgroup of acute myeloid leukemia with differential TP53 mutation status and prognosis: a single-center study from China.Annals of hematology · 2024Article
- Detection of novel PPP1R1B::STARD3 fusion transcript in acute myeloid leukemia: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2024Article
- Comprehensive insights into AML relapse: genetic mutations, clonal evolution, and clinical outcomes.Cancer cell international · 2024Article
- AML with complex karyotype: extreme genomic complexity revealed by combined long-read sequencing and Hi-C technology.Blood advances · 2023Article
31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) harboring three or more acquired chromosome aberrations in the absence of the prognostically favorable t(8;21)(q22;q22), inv(16)(p13q22)/t(6;16)(p13;q22), and t(15;17)(q22;q21) aberrations form a separate category - AML with a complex karyotype. They constitute 10% to 12% of all AML patents, with the incidence of complex karyotypes increasing with the more advanced age. Recent studies using molecular-cytogenetic techniques (spectral karyotyping [SKY], multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization [M-FISH]) and array comparative genomic hybridization (a-CGH) considerably improved characterization of previously unidentified, partially identified, or cryptic chromosome aberrations, and allowed precise delineation of genomic imbalances. The emerging nonrandom pattern of abnormalities includes relative paucity, but not absence, of balanced rearrangements (translocations, insertions, or inversions), predominance of aberrations leading to loss of chromosome material (monosomies, deletions, and unbalanced translocations) that involve, in decreasing order, chromosome arms 5q, 17p, 7q, 18q, 16q, 17q, 12p, 20q, 18p, and 3p, and the presence of recurrent, albeit less frequent and often hidden (in marker chromosomes and unbalanced translocations) aberrations leading to overrepresentation of segments from 8q, 11q, 21q, 22q, 1p, 9p, and 13q. Several candidate genes have been identified as targets of genomic losses, for example, TP53, CTNNA1, NF1, ETV6, and TCF4, and amplifications, for example, ERG, ETS2, APP, ETS1, FLI1, MLL, DDX6, GAB2, MYC, TRIB1, and CDX2. Treatment outcomes of complex karyotype patients receiving chemotherapy are very poor. They can be improved to some extent by allogeneic stem cell transplantation in younger patients. It is hoped that better understanding of genomic alterations will result in identification of novel therapeutic targets and improved prognosis in patients with complex karyotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.