Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18692475›Full record

ArticleCell2008

A protein domain-based interactome network for C. elegans early embryogenesis.

Mike Boxem, Zoltan Maliga, Niels Klitgord, Na Li, Irma Lemmens, Miyeko Mana, Lorenzo de Lichtervelde, Joram D Mul, Diederik van de Peut, Maxime Devos and 27 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 121 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
121citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

121 citing papers in PubMed, 210 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Analysis ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Functional significance of PUF partnerships inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. A combinedCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Mike BoxemCenter for Cancer Systems Biology and Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. mboxem@partners.org
Zoltan Maliga
Niels Klitgord
Na Li
Irma Lemmens
Miyeko Mana
Lorenzo de Lichtervelde
Joram D Mul
Diederik van de Peut
Maxime Devos
Nicolas Simonis
Muhammed A Yildirim
Murat Cokol
Huey-Ling Kao
Anne-Sophie de Smet
Haidong Wang
Anne-Lore Schlaitz
Tong Hao
Stuart Milstein
Changyu Fan
Mike Tipsword
Kevin Drew
Matilde Galli
Kahn Rhrissorrakrai
David Drechsel
Daphne Koller
Frederick P Roth
Lilia M Iakoucheva
A Keith Dunker
Richard Bonneau
Kristin C Gunsalus
David E Hill
Fabio Piano
Jan Tavernier
Sander van den Heuvel
Anthony A Hyman
Marc Vidal
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USNew York University · USMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics · DEGhent University · BEHarvard University · USStanford University · USUtrecht University · NLIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USRockefeller University · US

Funding

The C. elegans Interactome ProjectR01HG001715 · NHGRI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HILL, DAVID E., ROTH, FREDERICK P · 1998 to 2010
$16.5M
Integration of Oncogenic Networks in Cancer PhenotypesU54CA112952 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NEVINS, JOSEPH R · 2004 to 2009
$12.4M
Screen for genes targeted by homozygous deletion during cancer progressionP01CA095281 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HABER, DANIEL A. · 2002 to 2006
$8.4M
Integrated interactome mappingR33CA105405 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI VIDAL, MARC · 2004 to 2006
$2.0M
NEW TECHNOLOGIES FOR PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPINGR33CA081658 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI VIDAL, MARC · 2000 to 2002
$1.7M
Generation of a domain interaction map of C. elegans early embryogenesisR21RR023114 · NCRR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BOXEM, MIKE · 2006 to 2007
$472k
Protein structural disorder and ubiquitinationR21CA113711 · NCI · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI IAKOUCHEVA, LILIA M · 2007 to 2008
$356k
NCI NIH HHS CA95281NCI NIH HHS P01 CA095281NCI NIH HHS R21 CA113711NCI NIH HHS R21CA113711NCI NIH HHS R33 CA081658NCI NIH HHS R33 CA105405NCI NIH HHS R33CA105405NCI NIH HHS R33CA81658NCI NIH HHS U54 CA011295NCI NIH HHS U54 CA112952NCRR NIH HHS R21 RR023114NCRR NIH HHS R21RR023114NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG001715NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG001715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many protein-protein interactions are mediated through independently folding modular domains. Proteome-wide efforts to model protein-protein interaction or "interactome" networks have largely ignored this modular organization of proteins. We developed an experimental strategy to efficiently identify interaction domains and generated a domain-based interactome network for proteins involved in C. elegans early-embryonic cell divisions. Minimal interacting regions were identified for over 200 proteins, providing important information on their domain organization. Furthermore, our approach increased the sensitivity of the two-hybrid system, resulting in a more complete interactome network. This interactome modeling strategy revealed insights into C. elegans centrosome function and is applicable to other biological processes in this and other organisms.

Indexed as

Embryonic DevelopmentProtein Interaction MappingAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCell DivisionEmbryo, NonmammalianProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsProteomeTwo-Hybrid System TechniquesProteome

Identifiers

PMID18692475
PMCPMC2596478
OpenAlexW2014777266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.