Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18691040›Full record

ReviewCurrent medicinal chemistry2008

Recent trends in targeted anticancer prodrug and conjugate design.

Yashveer Singh, Matthew Palombo, Patrick J Sinko

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current medicinal chemistry, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 235 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Selective targeting of NRF2-high pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with an NQO1-activatable prodrug.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Anticancer Effect of Mycotoxins FromInternational journal of microbiology · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yashveer SinghDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8020, USA.
Matthew Palombo
Patrick J Sinko
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Enhancing Intestinal & Brain Uptake of Anti-AIDS DrugsR37AI051214 · NIAID · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI SINKO, PATRICK J. · 2006 to 2015
$4.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI051214NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI/DK-51214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anticancer drugs are often nonselective antiproliferative agents (cytotoxins) that preferentially kill dividing cells by attacking their DNA at some level. The lack of selectivity results in significant toxicity to noncancerous proliferating cells. These toxicities along with drug resistance exhibited by the solid tumors are major therapy limiting factors that result into poor prognosis for patients. Prodrug and conjugate design involves the synthesis of inactive drug derivatives that are converted to an active form inside the body and preferably at the site of action. Classical prodrug and conjugate design have focused on the development of prodrugs that can overcome physicochemical (e.g., solubility, chemical instability) or biopharmaceutical problems (e.g., bioavailability, toxicity) associated with common anticancer drugs. The recent targeted prodrug and conjugate design, on the other hand, hinge on the selective delivery of anticancer agents to tumor tissues thereby avoiding their cytotoxic effects on noncancerous cells. Targeting strategies have attempted to take advantage of low extracellular pH, elevated enzymes in tumor tissues, the hypoxic environment inside the tumor core, and tumor-specific antigens expressed on tumor cell surfaces. The present review highlights recent trends in prodrug and conjugate rationale and design for cancer treatment. The various approaches that are currently being explored are critically analyzed and a comparative account of the advantages and disadvantages associated with each approach is presented.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsAminoglycosidesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsChemistry, PharmaceuticalDNADrug CarriersDrug DesignGemtuzumabHumansImmunoconjugatesKineticsModels, ChemicalNeoplasmsPharmaceutical PreparationsAminoglycosidesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsDNADrug CarriersGemtuzumabImmunoconjugatesPharmaceutical PreparationsProdrugs

Identifiers

PMID18691040
PMCPMC2802226
OpenAlexW2131216411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.