Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18690552›Full record

ReviewJournal of inherited metabolic disease2008

The truth of treating patients with phenylketonuria after childhood: the need for a new guideline.

F J van Spronsen, P Burgard

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

F J van SpronsenSection of Metabolic Diseases, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. f.j.van.spronsen@bkk.umcg.nl
P Burgard

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, an increasing number of national guidelines on the treatment of phenylketonuria (PKU) have emerged. Most of these guidelines are dedicated to the care of children, while less attention is paid to the care of adults, although all guidelines underline the importance of diet for life. This review aims to summarize issues that need to be addressed within a guideline on the treatment of PKU, especially when care for patients beyond childhood is concerned. In this respect, it is of importance that adult patients, both willing and unwilling to be treated, need a guideline for care and follow-up. In PKU there is certainly a need for an improved unified guideline, especially after childhood, although many of the considerations in this article also apply to recommendations for treatment of children. Such a guideline will be a tool to improve treatment in PKU patients but should also include recommendations for collecting data for clinical and research purposes. Guideline development should also focus on nutritional, neuropsychological and psychosocial issues and not only on target plasma phenylalanine concentrations. In addition, guidelines must address not only what has to be done but also how it can be done, thereby improving concordance with the recommendations for treatment and management.

Indexed as

AdultBlood-Brain BarrierBone DensityChildDiet TherapyGuidelines as TopicHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingModels, BiologicalNutritional SciencesPhenylalaninePhenylketonuriasPhenylalanine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.