ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2009
[Vitamins for the eyes? Risks and opportunities for physician and patient].
Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Supplements in age-related macular degeneration: recommendations by the German Ophthalmological Society, the German Retina Society and the German Professional Association of Ophthalmologists--October 2014].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article discusses the effects of dietetic measures and specialized food supplements on age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and diabetic retinopathy. The sale of products in doctors' offices is already prohibited by laws governing the medical profession. The results of the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) concerning high doses of vitamins and zinc cannot simply be transferred to other doses and substances. Furthermore, there are health risks that have to be examined. Opportunities could arise for both doctor and patient if the AREDS formulation were granted authorization to be marketed as a medicinal product; however, a certain protective effect can be expected only for specific forms of AMD after a careful risk-benefit analysis and assessment within the statutory marketing authorization procedure for medicinal products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18690459What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.