ArticlePhysical therapy2008
Predictors of physical therapy clinic performance in the treatment of patients with low back pain syndromes.
Article in Physical therapy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02111278 (Lumbar Manipulation and Exercise for the Treatment of Acute Low Back Pain in Adolescents), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Lumbar Manipulation and Exercise for the Treatment of Acute Low Back Pain in Adolescents: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing Clinical Confidence: Effects of Medical Screening and Differential Diagnosis Training for Low Back Pain.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of manual therapy for patients with low back pain from the perspective of physical and psychosocial factors.Journal of physical therapy science · 2024Article
- Multifaceted Exercise Prescription in the Management of an Overhead Athlete with Suspected Distal Biceps Tendinopathy: A Case Report.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2020Article
- The use of STarT back screening tool to predict functional disability outcomes in patients receiving physical therapy for low back pain.The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2019Article
- Comparison of 2 Multimodal Interventions With and Without Whole Body Vibration Therapy Plus Traction on Pain and Disability in Patients With Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain.Journal of chiropractic medicine · 2016Article
- A proposed set of metrics for standardized outcome reporting in the management of low back pain.Acta orthopaedica · 2016Article
- Assessing the influence of treating therapist and patient prognostic factors on recovery from axial pain.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2013Article
- The STarT back screening tool and individual psychological measures: evaluation of prognostic capabilities for low back pain clinical outcomes in outpatient physical therapy settings.Physical therapy · 2013Article
- Weighted index explained more variance in physical function than an additively scored functional comorbidity scale.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2011Article
- Effectiveness of a 'Global Postural Reeducation' program for persistent low back pain: a non-randomized controlled trial.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2010Article
- Benchmarking physical therapy clinic performance: statistical methods to enhance internal validity when using observational data.Physical therapy · 2008Article
- The national sports safety in secondary schools benchmark (N4SB) study: defining athletic training practice characteristics.Journal of athletic trainingArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeLittle is known about organizational and service delivery factors related to quality of care in physical therapy. This study sought to identify characteristics related to differences in practice outcomes and service utilization. SUBJECTS: The sample comprised 114 outpatient clinics and 1,058 therapists who treated 16,281 patients with low back pain syndromes during the period 2000-2001. Clinics participated with the Focus on Therapeutic Outcomes, Inc (FOTO) database.
methodsHierarchical linear models were used to risk adjust treatment outcomes and number of visits per treatment episode. Aggregated residual scores from these models were used to classify each clinic into 1 of 3 categories in each of 3 types of performance groups: (1) effectiveness, (2) utilization, and (3) overall performance (ie, composite measure of effectiveness and utilization). Relationships between clinic classification and the following independent variables were examined by multinomial logistic regression: years of therapist experience, number of physical therapists, ratio of physical therapists to physical therapist assistants, proportion of patients with low back pain syndromes, number of new patients per physical therapist per month, utilization of physical therapist assistants, and setting.
resultsClinics that were lower utilizers of physical therapist assistants were 6.6 times more likely to be classified into the high effectiveness group compared with the low effectiveness group, 6.7 times more likely to be classified in the low utilization group compared with the high utilization group, and 12.4 times more likely to be classified in the best performance group compared with the worst performance group. Serving a higher proportion of patients with low back pain syndromes was associated with an increased likelihood of being classified in the lowest or middle group. Years of physical therapist experience was inversely associated with being classified in the middle utilization group compared with the highest utilization group. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionThese findings suggest that, in the treatment of patients with low back pain syndromes, clinics that are low utilizers of physical therapist assistants are more likely to provide superior care (ie, better patient outcomes and lower service use).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.