Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18688728›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2008

Prospects for lanthanides in structural biology by NMR.

Gottfried Otting

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 185 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Structural Insights Into ManAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Synthetic Approaches to Break the Chemical Shift Degeneracy of Glycans.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Overview of refinement procedures within REFMAC5: utilizing data from different sources.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gottfried OttingResearch School of Chemistry, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia. gottfried.otting@anu.edu.au
Australian National University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of different lanthanide-binding reagents has made site-specific labelling of proteins with paramagnetic lanthanides a viable proposition. This brings many powerful techniques originally established and demonstrated for paramagnetic metalloproteins into the mainstream of structural biology. The promise is that, by exploiting the long-range effects of paramagnetism, lanthanide labelling will allow the study of larger proteins and protein-ligand complexes with greater ease and accuracy than hitherto possible. In particular, lanthanide-induced pseudocontact shifts (PCS) provide powerful restraints and 3D structure determination using PCS as the only source of experimental restraints will probably be possible with data obtained from samples with different lanthanide-tagging sites. Cell-free protein synthesis is positioned to play an important role in this strategy, as an inexpensive source of selectively labelled protein samples and for easy site-specific incorporation of unnatural lanthanide-binding amino acids.

Indexed as

Cell-Free SystemLanthanoid Series ElementsMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyModels, MolecularProtein BiosynthesisProteinsLanthanoid Series ElementsProteins

Identifiers

PMID18688728
OpenAlexW1989786185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.