ArticleClinical rheumatology2009
Positiveness of purified protein derivatives in rheumatoid arthritis patients who are not receiving immunosuppressive therapy.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Purified protein derivative test and its booster phenomenon in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Advanced biomedical research · 2015Article
- High incidence of intolerance to tuberculosis chemoprophylaxis.Rheumatology international · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, biological agents have emerged as the most popular drugs for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The most frightening side effects of biological agents are infections, with tuberculosis being the leader. On account of the fact that biological agents have been used widespread, a number of algorithms have been developed to search latent tuberculosis. Among these algorithms, the most popular is the purified protein derivatives (PPD) test which is based upon late sensitivity reaction. The objective of this trial is to investigate the relevance of PPD response for the disease in RA patients. A total of 149 subjects (80 patients, 69 healthy), 35 RA patients who have not been treated before, 23 RA and 22 AS patients who are candidates for biological agents and being treated with immunosuppressive drugs, and 69 healthy subjects, have been included in this trial. Swelling joints, number of tender joints, visual analog scale, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and rheumatoid factor were recorded. PPD was performed using the Mantoux method and was measured 72 h later. Statistically significant lower PPD values were determined in untreated RA patients compared to PPD values of treated RA and AS patients and healthy subjects. No correlation was determined between disease activity score 28 activity and PPD values in untreated and treated groups. Similarly, there was no correlation between acute phase reactants and PPD. Lower PPD responses in patients not being treated with immunosuppressive are due to the disease itself, rather than to the drugs being used. It is also important to interpret PPD results in early RA patients with suspicion, when it is intended to start anti tumor necrosis factor therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18688673What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.