Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18687794›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2008

Whole-genome scanning by array comparative genomic hybridization as a clinical tool for risk assessment in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Shelly R Gunn, Mansoor S Mohammed, Mercedes E Gorre, Philip D Cotter, Jaeweon Kim, David W Bahler, Sergey N Preobrazhensky, Russell A Higgins, Aswani R Bolla, Sahar H Ismail and 8 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. TCL1 targeting miR-3676 is codeleted with tumor protein p53 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Shelly R GunnThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Department of Pathology, Mail Code 7750, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr., San Antonio, TX, USA. gunn@uthscsa.edu
Mansoor S Mohammed
Mercedes E Gorre
Philip D Cotter
Jaeweon Kim
David W Bahler
Sergey N Preobrazhensky
Russell A Higgins
Aswani R Bolla
Sahar H Ismail
Daphne de Jong
Eric Eldering
Marinus H J van Oers
Clemens H M Mellink
Michael J Keating
Ellen J Schlette
Lynne V Abruzzo
Ryan S Robetorye

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) provides a powerful method for simultaneous genome-wide scanning and prognostic marker assessment in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In the current study, commercially available bacterial artificial chromosome and oligonucleotide array CGH platforms were used to identify chromosomal alterations of prognostic significance in 174 CLL cases. Tumor genomes were initially analyzed by bacterial artificial chromosome array CGH followed by confirmation and breakpoint mapping using oligonucleotide arrays. Genomic changes involving loci currently interrogated by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) panels were detected in 155 cases (89%) at expected frequencies: 13q14 loss (47%), trisomy 12 (13%), 11q loss (11%), 6q loss (7.5%), and 17p loss (4.6%). Genomic instability was the second most commonly identified alteration of prognostic significance with three or more alterations involving loci not interrogated by FISH panels identified in 37 CLL cases (21%). A subset of 48 CLL cases analyzed by six-probe FISH panels (288 total hybridizations) was concordant with array CGH results for 275 hybridizations (95.5%); 13 hybridizations (4.5%) were discordant because of clonal populations that comprised less than 30% of the sample. Array CGH is a powerful, cost-effective tool for genome-wide risk assessment in the clinical evaluation of CLL.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsChromosome BreakageChromosome MappingChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialGenome, HumanGenomic InstabilityHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNucleic Acid HybridizationOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID18687794
PMCPMC2518739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.