Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18687718›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2008

Clomifene citrate or unstimulated intrauterine insemination compared with expectant management for unexplained infertility: pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

S Bhattacharya, K Harrild, J Mollison, S Wordsworth, C Tay, A Harrold, D McQueen, H Lyall, L Johnston, J Burrage and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
17.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 195 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evidence-based guideline: unexplained infertility†.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Guideline
  2. In vitro fertilisation for unexplained subfertility.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Intra-uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. In vitro fertilisation for unexplained subfertility.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  6. Female infertility.BMJ clinical evidence · 2010
    Pooled it
  7. Clomiphene citrate for unexplained subfertility in women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Male infertility.Systems biology in reproductive medicine · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

S BhattacharyaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD. s.bhattacharya@abdn.ac.uk
K Harrild
J Mollison
S Wordsworth
C Tay
A Harrold
D McQueen
H Lyall
L Johnston
J Burrage
S Grossett
H Walton
J Lynch
A Johnstone
S Kini
A Raja
A Templeton
University of Aberdeen · GBEdinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBGlasgow Royal Infirmary · GBNinewells Hospital · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBMRC Centre for Reproductive Health · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the effectiveness of clomifene citrate and unstimulated intrauterine insemination with expectant management for the treatment of unexplained infertility.

designThree arm parallel group, pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

settingFour teaching hospitals and a district general hospital in Scotland.

participantsCouples with infertility for over two years, confirmed ovulation, patent fallopian tubes, and motile sperm.

interventionExpectant management, oral clomifene citrate, and unstimulated intrauterine insemination.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was live birth. Secondary outcome measures included clinical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, miscarriage, and acceptability.

results580 women were randomised to expectant management (n=193), oral clomifene citrate (n=194), or unstimulated intrauterine insemination (n=193) for six months. The three randomised groups were comparable in terms of age, body mass index, duration of infertility, sperm concentration, and motility. Live birth rates were 32/193 (17%), 26/192 (14%), and 43/191 (23%), respectively. Compared with expectant management, the odds ratio for a live birth was 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.45 to 1.38) after clomifene citrate and 1.46 (0.88 to 2.43) after unstimulated intrauterine insemination. More women randomised to clomifene citrate (159/170, 94%) and unstimulated intrauterine insemination (155/162, 96%) found the process of treatment acceptable than those randomised to expectant management (123/153, 80%) (P=0.001 and P<0.001, respectively).

conclusionIn couples with unexplained infertility existing treatments such as empirical clomifene and unstimulated intrauterine insemination are unlikely to offer superior live birth rates compared with expectant management.

trial registrationISRCT No: 71762042.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultClomipheneCosts and Cost AnalysisFemaleFertility Agents, FemaleHumansInfertility, FemaleInsemination, Artificial, HomologousMalePregnancyPregnancy OutcomeTime FactorsClomipheneFertility Agents, Female

Identifiers

PMID18687718
PMCPMC2505091
OpenAlexW2093772882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.