ArticleCurrent infectious disease reports2008
Adjunctive therapies in severe sepsis and septic shock: current place of steroids.
Article in Current infectious disease reports, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reevaluating the Role of Corticosteroids in Septic Shock: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.BioMed research international · 2019Pooled it
- Updating the evidence for the role of corticosteroids in severe sepsis and septic shock: a Bayesian meta-analytic perspective.Critical care (London, England) · 2010Pooled it
- Global utilization of low-dose corticosteroids in severe sepsis and septic shock: a report from the PROGRESS registry.Critical care (London, England) · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For more than five decades, the use of corticosteroids as an adjunctive therapy to treat severe sepsis and septic shock has incited consistent debate. Negative results of the Corticosteroid Therapy of Septic Shock (CORTICUS) study evoked a revision of Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines suggesting a more restricted use of low-dose hydrocortisone only in patients with severe septic shock. Hemodynamic improvement by low-dose steroids was evident and independent from adrenal insufficiency, but did not improve survival. The roles of cortisol measurement and adrenal function tests for treatment decisions have been questioned. An international task force introduced the concept of critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency, which challenges the predominant role of adrenal dysfunction and underscores sustained inflammation due to tissue steroid resistance. Whether moderate steroid doses induce superinfections and muscle weakness is unclear. This article reviews recent publications, actual recommendations, ongoing discussions, and future perspectives.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.