Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18685035›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2008

Cross-correlation in the auditory coincidence detectors of owls.

Brian J Fischer, G Björn Christianson, José Luis Peña

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Synthesis of Hemispheric ITD Tuning from the Readout of a Neural Map: Commonalities of Proposed Coding Schemes in Birds and Mammals.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  5. Neural Maps of Interaural Time Difference in the American Alligator: A Stable Feature in Modern Archosaurs.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Reverse correlation analysis of auditory-nerve fiber responses to broadband noise in a bird, the barn owl.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Behavioral sensitivity to broadband binaural localization cues in the ferret.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2013
    Article
  13. Binaural gain modulation of spectrotemporal tuning in the interaural level difference-coding pathway.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Transformation from a pure time delay to a mixed time and phase delay representation in the auditory forebrain pathway.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  16. Effect of instantaneous frequency glides on interaural time difference processing by auditory coincidence detectors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  17. Computation of interaural time difference in the owl's coincidence detector neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2011
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Target-approaching behavior of barn owls (Tyto alba): influence of sound frequency.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2010
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brian J FischerDivision of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA.
G Björn Christianson
José Luis Peña

Funding

Coding of Auditory Space in the Avian BrainR01DC007690 · NIDCD · ALBERT EINSTEIN COL OF MED YESHIVA UNIV · PI PENA, JOSE L · 2005 to 2025
$7.5M
NEUROPHYSIOLOGY OF SOUND LOCALIZATIONR01DC000134 · NIDCD · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KONISHI, MASAKAZU · 1989 to 2006
$2.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC00134NIDCD NIH HHS DC007690NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000134NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC007690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interaural time difference (ITD) plays a central role in many auditory functions, most importantly in sound localization. The classic model for how ITD is computed was put forth by Jeffress (1948). One of the predictions of the Jeffress model is that the neurons that compute ITD should behave as cross-correlators. Whereas cross-correlation-like properties of the ITD-computing neurons have been reported, attempts to show that the shape of the ITD response function is determined by the spectral tuning of the neuron, a core prediction of cross-correlation, have been unsuccessful. Using reverse correlation analysis, we demonstrate in the barn owl that the relationship between the spectral tuning and the ITD response of the ITD-computing neurons is that predicted by cross-correlation. Moreover, we show that a model of coincidence detector responses derived from responses to binaurally uncorrelated noise is consistent with binaural interaction based on cross-correlation. These results are thus consistent with one of the key tenets of the Jeffress model. Our work sets forth both the methodology to answer whether cross-correlation describes coincidence detector responses and a demonstration that in the barn owl, the result is that expected by theory.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory PathwaysEarNeuronsSound LocalizationStrigiformesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID18685035
PMCPMC2637928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.