ArticlePloS one2008
A dynamic stochastic model for DNA replication initiation in early embryos.
Article in PloS one, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dual DNA replication modes: varying fork speeds and initiation rates within the spatial replication program in Xenopus.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Rif1 restrains the rate of replication origin firing in Xenopus laevis.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Neural network and kinetic modelling of human genome replication reveal replication origin locations and strengths.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Modeling the Dynamics of Eukaryotic DNA Synthesis in Remembrance of Tunde Ogunnaike.Industrial & engineering chemistry research · 2023Article
- DNA replication timing: Biochemical mechanisms and biological significance.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2022Article
- Organization of DNA Replication Origin Firing inGenes · 2021Article
- Article
- Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) is a positive regulator of DNA replication in theCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2020Article
- Molecular Mechanisms of DNA Replication and Repair Machinery: Insights from Microscopic Simulations.Advanced theory and simulations · 2019Article
- On the Interplay of the DNA Replication Program and the Intra-S Phase Checkpoint Pathway.Genes · 2019Review
- Article
- Model-based analysis of DNA replication profiles: predicting replication fork velocity and initiation rate by profiling free-cycling cells.Genome research · 2017Article
- 3D replicon distributions arise from stochastic initiation and domino-like DNA replication progression.Nature communications · 2016Article
- 4D Visualization of replication foci in mammalian cells corresponding to individual replicons.Nature communications · 2016Article
- Deciphering DNA replication dynamics in eukaryotic cell populations in relation with their averaged chromatin conformations.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Replication landscape of the human genome.Nature communications · 2016Article
- Article
- Epigenetic landscape for initiation of DNA replication.Chromosoma · 2014Review
- The three most important things about origins: location, location, location.Molecular systems biology · 2014Article
- DNA replication timing.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEukaryotic cells seem unable to monitor replication completion during normal S phase, yet must ensure a reliable replication completion time. This is an acute problem in early Xenopus embryos since DNA replication origins are located and activated stochastically, leading to the random completion problem. DNA combing, kinetic modelling and other studies using Xenopus egg extracts have suggested that potential origins are much more abundant than actual initiation events and that the time-dependent rate of initiation, I(t), markedly increases through S phase to ensure the rapid completion of unreplicated gaps and a narrow distribution of completion times. However, the molecular mechanism that underlies this increase has remained obscure. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsUsing both previous and novel DNA combing data we have confirmed that I(t) increases through S phase but have also established that it progressively decreases before the end of S phase. To explore plausible biochemical scenarios that might explain these features, we have performed comparisons between numerical simulations and DNA combing data. Several simple models were tested: i) recycling of a limiting replication fork component from completed replicons; ii) time-dependent increase in origin efficiency; iii) time-dependent increase in availability of an initially limiting factor, e.g. by nuclear import. None of these potential mechanisms could on its own account for the data. We propose a model that combines time-dependent changes in availability of a replication factor and a fork-density dependent affinity of this factor for potential origins. This novel model quantitatively and robustly accounted for the observed changes in initiation rate and fork density. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This work provides a refined temporal profile of replication initiation rates and a robust, dynamic model that quantitatively explains replication origin usage during early embryonic S phase. These results have significant implications for the organisation of replication origins in higher eukaryotes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.