ArticleTrials2008
A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction with point of care testing in a general practice setting - rationale, design and baseline characteristics.
Article in Trials, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Self-monitoring and self-management of oral anticoagulation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Primary care clinicians' attitudes towards point-of-care blood testing: a systematic review of qualitative studies.BMC family practice · 2013Pooled it
- Study protocol of the ESUB-MG cluster randomized trial: a pragmatic trial assessing the implementation of urine drug screening in general practice for buprenorphine maintained patients.BMC family practice · 2016Trial
- The cost-effectiveness of point of care testing in a general practice setting: results from a randomised controlled trial.BMC health services research · 2010Trial
- Patient satisfaction with point-of-care testing in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010Trial
- Current smartphone-assisted point-of-care cancer detection: Towards supporting personalized cancer monitoring.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2024Article
- Typology of organizational innovation components: building blocks to improve access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations.International journal for equity in health · 2020Review
- Embedding new technologies in practice - a normalization process theory study of point of care testing.BMC health services research · 2016Article
- What are patients' expectations about the organization of their primary care physicians' practices?BMC health services research · 2015Article
- Feasibility of HIV point-of-care tests for resource-limited settings: challenges and solutions.BMC medicine · 2014Article
- Diagnostic point-of-care tests in resource-limited settings.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2014Review
- Molecular analysis of blood with micro-/nanoscale field-effect-transistor biosensors.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2011Review
- Preferences of diabetes patients and physicians: a feasibility study to identify the key indicators for appraisal of health care values.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2010Article
- The Evidence to Support Point-of-Care Testing.The Clinical biochemist. Reviews · 2010Review
- Evolution of Point-of-Care Testing in Australia.The Clinical biochemist. Reviews · 2010Review
- The Conduct of Quality Control and Quality Assurance Testing for PoCT Outside the Laboratory.The Clinical biochemist. Reviews · 2010Article
- Point-of-Care International Normalized Ratio (INR) Monitoring Devices for Patients on Long-term Oral Anticoagulation Therapy: An Evidence-Based Analysis.Ontario health technology assessment series · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPoint of care testing (PoCT) may be a useful adjunct in the management of chronic conditions in general practice (GP). The provision of pathology test results at the time of the consultation could lead to enhanced clinical management, better health outcomes, greater convenience and satisfaction for patients and general practitioners (GPs), and savings in costs and time. It could also result in inappropriate testing, increased consultations and poor health outcomes resulting from inaccurate results. Currently there are very few randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in GP that have investigated these aspects of PoCT. DESIGN/
methodsThe Point of Care Testing in General Practice Trial (PoCT Trial) was an Australian Government funded multi-centre, cluster randomised controlled trial to determine the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction of PoCT in a GP setting.The PoCT Trial covered an 18 month period with the intervention consisting of the use of PoCT for seven tests used in the management of patients with diabetes, hyperlipidaemia and patients on anticoagulant therapy. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients within target range, a measure of therapeutic control. In addition, the PoCT Trial investigated the safety of PoCT, impact of PoCT on patient compliance to medication, stakeholder satisfaction, cost effectiveness of PoCT versus laboratory testing, and influence of geographic location. DISCUSSION: The paper provides an overview of the Trial Design, the rationale for the research methodology chosen and how the Trial was implemented in a GP environment. The evaluation protocol and data collection processes took into account the large number of patients, the broad range of practice types distributed over a large geographic area, and the inclusion of pathology test results from multiple pathology laboratories.The evaluation protocol developed reflects the complexity of the Trial setting, the Trial Design and the approach taken within the funding provided. The PoCT Trial is regarded as a pragmatic RCT, evaluating the effectiveness of implementing PoCT in GP and every effort was made to ensure that, in these circumstances, internal and external validity was maintained.
trial registration12612605000272695.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.