Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18680592›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2008

Gene Ontology term overlap as a measure of gene functional similarity.

Meeta Mistry, Paul Pavlidis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bayesian profile regression for clustering analysis involving a longitudinal response and explanatory variables.Methodology : European journal of research methods for the behavioral & social sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Extended Multitarget Pharmacology of Anticancer Drugs.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Meeta MistryDepartment of Psychiatry and Centre for High-throughput Biology, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada. mmistry@bioinformatics.ubc.ca
Paul Pavlidis

Funding

Neuroinformatics for gene expression: networks, function and meta-analysisR01GM076990 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI BIROL, INANC, PAVLIDIS, PAUL · 2005 to 2014
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM076990NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe availability of various high-throughput experimental and computational methods allows biologists to rapidly infer functional relationships between genes. It is often necessary to evaluate these predictions computationally, a task that requires a reference database for functional relatedness. One such reference is the Gene Ontology (GO). A number of groups have suggested that the semantic similarity of the GO annotations of genes can serve as a proxy for functional relatedness. Here we evaluate a simple measure of semantic similarity, term overlap (TO).

resultsWe computed the TO for randomly selected gene pairs from the mouse genome. For comparison, we implemented six previously reported semantic similarity measures that share the feature of using computation of probabilities of terms to infer information content, in addition to three vector based approaches and a normalized version of the TO measure. We find that the overlap measure is highly correlated with the others but differs in detail. TO is at least as good a predictor of sequence similarity as the other measures. We further show that term overlap may avoid some problems that affect the probability-based measures. Term overlap is also much faster to compute than the information content-based measures.

conclusionOur experiments suggest that term overlap can serve as a simple and fast alternative to other approaches which use explicit information content estimation or require complex pre-calculations, while also avoiding problems that some other measures may encounter.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticAnimalsComputational BiologyGenesGenomicsInformation Storage and RetrievalMiceNatural Language ProcessingSemanticsVocabulary, Controlled

Identifiers

PMID18680592
PMCPMC2518162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.