Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18680591›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2008

Combined milrinone and enteral metoprolol therapy in patients with septic myocardial depression.

Christian A Schmittinger, Martin W Dünser, Maria Haller, Hanno Ulmer, Günter Luckner, Christian Torgersen, Stefan Jochberger, Walter R Hasibeder

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Metoprolol in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2021
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Role of adrenergic receptors in shock.Frontiers in physiology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Beta-Adrenergic Blockade in Critical Illness.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Response.Chest · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christian A SchmittingerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria. christian.schmittinger@i-med.ac.at
Martin W Dünser
Maria Haller
Hanno Ulmer
Günter Luckner
Christian Torgersen
Stefan Jochberger
Walter R Hasibeder
Innsbruck Medical University · ATOrdensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe multifactorial etiology of septic cardiomyopathy is not fully elucidated. Recently, high catecholamine levels have been suggested to contribute to impaired myocardial function.

methodsThis retrospective analysis summarizes our preliminary clinical experience with the combined use of milrinone and enteral metoprolol therapy in 40 patients with septic shock and cardiac depression. Patients with other causes of shock or cardiac failure, patients with beta-blocker therapy initiated more than 48 hours after shock onset, and patients with pre-existent decompensated congestive heart failure were excluded. In all study patients, beta blockers were initiated only after stabilization of cardiovascular function (17.7 +/- 15.5 hours after shock onset or intensive care unit admission) in order to decrease the heart rate to less than 95 beats per minute (bpm). Hemodynamic data and laboratory parameters were extracted from medical charts and documented before and 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after the first metoprolol dosage. Adverse cardiovascular events were documented. Descriptive statistical methods and a linear mixed-effects model were used for statistical analysis.

resultsHeart rate control (65 to 95 bpm) was achieved in 97.5% of patients (n = 39) within 12.2 +/- 12.4 hours. Heart rate, central venous pressure, and norepinephrine, arginine vasopressin, and milrinone dosages decreased (all P < 0.001). Cardiac index and cardiac power index remained unchanged whereas stroke volume index increased (P = 0.002). In two patients (5%), metoprolol was discontinued because of asymptomatic bradycardia. Norepinephrine and milrinone dosages were increased in nine (22.5%) and six (15%) patients, respectively. pH increased (P < 0.001) whereas arterial lactate (P < 0.001), serum C-reactive protein (P = 0.001), and creatinine (P = 0.02) levels decreased during the observation period. Twenty-eight-day mortality was 33%.

conclusionLow doses of enteral metoprolol in combination with phosphodiesterase inhibitors are feasible in patients with septic shock and cardiac depression but no overt heart failure. Future prospective controlled trials on the use of beta blockers for septic cardiomyopathy and their influence on proinflammatory cytokines are warranted.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCardiomyopathiesDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMaleMetoprololMiddle AgedMilrinoneRetrospective StudiesSepsisMetoprololMilrinone

Identifiers

PMID18680591
PMCPMC2575588
OpenAlexW2136119774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.