ArticleCritical care (London, England)2008
Combined milrinone and enteral metoprolol therapy in patients with septic myocardial depression.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beta-blocker treatment in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Effects of adjunctive milrinone versus placebo on hemodynamics in patients with septic shock: a randomized controlled trial.Annals of medicine · 2025Trial
- Metoprolol in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2021Trial
- The Effect of Esmolol on Tissue Perfusion and Clinical Prognosis of Patients with Severe Sepsis: A Prospective Cohort Study.BioMed research international · 2016Trial
- Combination therapy with milrinone and esmolol for heart protection in patients with severe sepsis: a prospective, randomized trial.Clinical drug investigation · 2015Trial
- Association of anti-catecholaminergic antiarrhythmic drugs with survival in sepsis-associated new-onset atrial fibrillation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Survival outcomes, determinants, and hemodynamic trajectories with intravenous βFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Metoprolol use is associated with improved outcomes in patients with sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy: an analysis of the MIMIC-IV database.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Observational
- Article
- Article
- Role of adrenergic receptors in shock.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Review
- The Usage of Concomitant Beta-Blockers with Vasopressors and Inotropes in Cardiogenic Shock.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Beta-Adrenergic Blockade in Critical Illness.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Sepsis-Induced Cardiomyopathy: a Comprehensive Review.Current cardiology reports · 2020Review
- Heart failure and sepsis: practical recommendations for the optimal management.Heart failure reviews · 2020Review
- Effect of landiolol on sex-related transcriptomic changes in the myocardium during sepsis.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2019Article
- Response.Chest · 2019Article
- Article
- Esmolol infusion in patients with septic shock and tachycardia: a prospective, single-arm, feasibility study.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2018Article
- Outpatient beta-blockers and survival from sepsis: Results from a national cohort of Medicare beneficiaries.American journal of surgery · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe multifactorial etiology of septic cardiomyopathy is not fully elucidated. Recently, high catecholamine levels have been suggested to contribute to impaired myocardial function.
methodsThis retrospective analysis summarizes our preliminary clinical experience with the combined use of milrinone and enteral metoprolol therapy in 40 patients with septic shock and cardiac depression. Patients with other causes of shock or cardiac failure, patients with beta-blocker therapy initiated more than 48 hours after shock onset, and patients with pre-existent decompensated congestive heart failure were excluded. In all study patients, beta blockers were initiated only after stabilization of cardiovascular function (17.7 +/- 15.5 hours after shock onset or intensive care unit admission) in order to decrease the heart rate to less than 95 beats per minute (bpm). Hemodynamic data and laboratory parameters were extracted from medical charts and documented before and 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after the first metoprolol dosage. Adverse cardiovascular events were documented. Descriptive statistical methods and a linear mixed-effects model were used for statistical analysis.
resultsHeart rate control (65 to 95 bpm) was achieved in 97.5% of patients (n = 39) within 12.2 +/- 12.4 hours. Heart rate, central venous pressure, and norepinephrine, arginine vasopressin, and milrinone dosages decreased (all P < 0.001). Cardiac index and cardiac power index remained unchanged whereas stroke volume index increased (P = 0.002). In two patients (5%), metoprolol was discontinued because of asymptomatic bradycardia. Norepinephrine and milrinone dosages were increased in nine (22.5%) and six (15%) patients, respectively. pH increased (P < 0.001) whereas arterial lactate (P < 0.001), serum C-reactive protein (P = 0.001), and creatinine (P = 0.02) levels decreased during the observation period. Twenty-eight-day mortality was 33%.
conclusionLow doses of enteral metoprolol in combination with phosphodiesterase inhibitors are feasible in patients with septic shock and cardiac depression but no overt heart failure. Future prospective controlled trials on the use of beta blockers for septic cardiomyopathy and their influence on proinflammatory cytokines are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.