Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18680404›Full record

ArticleHuman gene therapy2008

Human gene targeting favors insertions over deletions.

David W Russell, Roli K Hirata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human gene therapy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Engineering of human pluripotent stem cells by AAV-mediated gene targeting.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David W RussellDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. drussell@u.washington
Roli K Hirata

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene targeting is a powerful technique for manipulating the human genome, but few studies have directly compared the targeting frequencies of various types of vector constructs. Here we show that similar targeting constructs are able to insert nucleotides at the homologous chromosomal target locus more efficiently than they can delete nucleotides, and combination insertion/deletion vectors appear to target at intermediate frequencies. This holds true for deletions ranging from 1 to 334 bp and insertions ranging from 1 to 1332 bp. In addition, vectors designed to inactivate the human hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase gene (HPRT) by deleting nucleotides often produced rearrangements at the target locus that in many cases were due to insertions of multimerized vector constructs, effectively converting a deletion vector into an insertion vector. These findings were obtained when adeno-associated virus vectors were used to efficiently deliver single-stranded DNA targeting constructs, but the same phenomenon was also observed when transfecting linearized double-stranded plasmids. Thus human cells distinguish between deletion and insertion vectors and process their recombination intermediates differently, presumably at the heteroduplex stage, with implications for the design of gene-targeting vectors and the evolution of human genomes.

Indexed as

Gene DeletionMutagenesis, InsertionalAlkaline PhosphataseBase SequenceCell LineDependovirusGene TargetingGenetic VectorsGenome, HumanHumansHypoxanthine PhosphoribosyltransferaseMutationPlasmidsTransfectionAlkaline PhosphataseHypoxanthine Phosphoribosyltransferase

Identifiers

PMID18680404
PMCPMC2940567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.