Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18680228›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of gastroenterology2008

Folic acid supplementation inhibits recurrence of colorectal adenomas: a randomized chemoprevention trial.

Richard Jaszewski, Sabeena Misra, Martin Tobi, Nadeem Ullah, Jo Ann Naumoff, Omer Kucuk, Edi Levi, Bradley N Axelrod, Bhaumik B Patel, Adhip P N Majumdar

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of gastroenterology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Chemopreventive strategies for sporadic colorectal cancer: a narrative review.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Associations between diet and nutritional supplements and colorectal cancer: A systematic review.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for folate.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Richard JaszewskiJohn D Dingell VA Medical Center, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Sabeena Misra
Martin Tobi
Nadeem Ullah
Jo Ann Naumoff
Omer Kucuk
Edi Levi
Bradley N Axelrod
Bhaumik B Patel
Adhip P N Majumdar
Wayne State University · USJohn D. Dingell VA Medical Center · US

Funding

The Aging Gut:Regulation of Cell ProliferationR01AG014343 · NIA · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MAJUMDAR, ADHIP P. N. · 1997 to 2011
$2.8M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG014343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo determine whether folic acid supplementation will reduce the recurrence of colorectal adenomas, the precursors of colorectal cancer, we performed a double-blind placebo-controlled trial in patients with adenomatous polyps.

methodsIn the current double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at this VA Medical Center, patients with colorectal adenomas were randomly assigned to receive either a daily 5 mg dose of folic acid or a matched identical placebo for 3 years. All polyps were removed at baseline colonoscopy and each patient had a follow up colonoscopy at 3 years. The primary endpoint was a reduction in the number of recurrent adenomas at 3 years.

resultsOf 137 subjects, who were eligible after confirmation of polyp histology and run-in period to conform compliance, 94 completed the study; 49 in folic acid group and 45 in placebo group. Recurrence of adenomas at 3-year was compared between the two groups. The mean number of recurrent polyps at 3-year was 0.36 (SD, 0.69) for folic acid treated patients compared to 0.82 (SD, 1.17) for placebo treated subjects, resulting in a 3-fold increase in polyp recurrence in the placebo group. Patients below 70 years of age and those with left-sided colonic adenomas or advanced adenomas responded better to folic acid supplementation.

conclusionHigh dose folic acid supplementation is associated with a significant reduction in the recurrence of colonic adenomas suggesting that folic acid may be an effective chemopreventive agent for colorectal neoplasia.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAdenomaAgedColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFolic AcidFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRisk FactorsFolic Acid

Identifiers

PMID18680228
PMCPMC2731275
OpenAlexW2039850131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.