Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18679801›Full record

ReviewBrain cell biology2008

Genetically encoded fluorescent sensors of membrane potential.

B J Baker, H Mutoh, D Dimitrov, W Akemann, A Perron, Y Iwamoto, L Jin, L B Cohen, E Y Isacoff, V A Pieribone and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain cell biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Molecular Optimization of Rhodopsin-Based Tools for Neuroscience Applications.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Imaging and analysis of genetically encoded calcium indicators linking neural circuits and behaviors.The Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicators: Opportunities and Challenges.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Optogenetic Visualization of Presynaptic Tonic Inhibition of Cerebellar Parallel Fibers.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

B J BakerDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
H Mutoh
D Dimitrov
W Akemann
A Perron
Y Iwamoto
L Jin
L B Cohen
E Y Isacoff
V A Pieribone
T Hughes
T Knöpfel

Funding

Scan of Protein Space for Optical Voltage ProbesU24NS057631 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN, LAWRENCE B · 2007 to 2011
$5.2M
Optical Studies of Neuron Activity and OrganizationR56DC005259 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN, LAWRENCE B · 2007 to 2007
$413k
NIDCD NIH HHS R56 DC005259NINDS NIH HHS NS057631NINDS NIH HHS U24 NS057631
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging activity of neurons in intact brain tissue was conceived several decades ago and, after many years of development, voltage-sensitive dyes now offer the highest spatial and temporal resolution for imaging neuronal functions in the living brain. Further progress in this field is expected from the emergent development of genetically encoded fluorescent sensors of membrane potential. These fluorescent protein (FP) voltage sensors overcome the drawbacks of organic voltage sensitive dyes such as non-specificity of cell staining and the low accessibility of the dye to some cell types. In a transgenic animal, a genetically encoded sensor could in principle be expressed specifically in any cell type and would have the advantage of staining only the cell population determined by the specificity of the promoter used to drive expression. Here we critically review the current status of these developments.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiosensing TechniquesCell LineGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansIon ChannelsMembrane PotentialsMiceMice, TransgenicNerve NetGreen Fluorescent ProteinsIon Channels

Identifiers

PMID18679801
PMCPMC2775812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.