Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18679735›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2008

Patient-specific surgical planning and hemodynamic computational fluid dynamics optimization through free-form haptic anatomy editing tool (SURGEM).

Kerem Pekkan, Brian Whited, Kirk Kanter, Shiva Sharma, Diane de Zelicourt, Kartik Sundareswaran, David Frakes, Jarek Rossignac, Ajit P Yoganathan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A novel Fontan Y-graft for interrupted inferior vena cava and azygos continuation.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kerem PekkanBiomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. kpekkan@andrew.cmu.edu
Brian Whited
Kirk Kanter
Shiva Sharma
Diane de Zelicourt
Kartik Sundareswaran
David Frakes
Jarek Rossignac
Ajit P Yoganathan
Georgia Institute of Technology · USArizona State University · USCarnegie Mellon University · USEmory University · USThe Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering · US

Funding

YEAST ER MOLECULAR CHAPERONE TRANSLOCATION: GENOME DATABANK HOMOLOGSP41RR006009 · NCRR · MELLON PITTS CORPORATION (MPC CORP) · PI KNOLL, ERIC · 1990 to 2011
$22.0M
Improving Flow Dynamics in Fontan SurgeriesR01HL067622 · NHLBI · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI YOGANATHAN, AJIT P · 2002 to 2006
$5.2M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR006009NHLBI NIH HHS HL67622NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL067622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first version of an anatomy editing/surgical planning tool (SURGEM) targeting anatomical complexity and patient-specific computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis is presented. Novel three-dimensional (3D) shape editing concepts and human-shape interaction technologies have been integrated to facilitate interactive surgical morphology alterations, grid generation and CFD analysis. In order to implement "manual hemodynamic optimization" at the surgery planning phase for patients with congenital heart defects, these tools are applied to design and evaluate possible modifications of patient-specific anatomies. In this context, anatomies involve complex geometric topologies and tortuous 3D blood flow pathways with multiple inlets and outlets. These tools make it possible to freely deform the lumen surface and to bend and position baffles through real-time, direct manipulation of the 3D models with both hands, thus eliminating the tedious and time-consuming phase of entering the desired geometry using traditional computer-aided design (CAD) systems. The 3D models of the modified anatomies are seamlessly exported and meshed for patient-specific CFD analysis. Free-formed anatomical modifications are quantified using an in-house skeletization based cross-sectional geometry analysis tool. Hemodynamic performance of the systematically modified anatomies is compared with the original anatomy using CFD. CFD results showed the relative importance of the various surgically created features such as pouch size, vena cave to pulmonary artery (PA) flare and PA stenosis. An interactive surgical-patch size estimator is also introduced. The combined design/analysis cycle time is used for comparing and optimizing surgical plans and improvements are tabulated. The reduced cost of patient-specific shape design and analysis process, made it possible to envision large clinical studies to assess the validity of predictive patient-specific CFD simulations. In this paper, model anatomical design studies are performed on a total of eight different complex patient specific anatomies. Using SURGEM, more than 30 new anatomical designs (or candidate configurations) are created, and the corresponding user times presented. CFD performances for eight of these candidate configurations are also presented.

Indexed as

HemorheologyModels, CardiovascularComputer-Aided DesignComputer SimulationHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingSurgery, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID18679735
OpenAlexW2024168274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.